Reference (passed peer review btw):
Muhammad Salman Hameed, Hongxuan Cao, Li Guo, Lei Zeng, Yanliang Ren, Advancements, challenges, and future frontiers in covalent inhibitors and covalent drugs: A review, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Reports, Volume 12, 2024, 100217, ISSN 2772-4174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmcr.2024.100217
Try this link if the above doesn’t work (not that it’s worth visiting in the first place…): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277241742400089X?via=ihub
“I have lung cancer? How bad is it?”
“Well let’s just say it’s…non-small lung cancer.”I just want to see the tiny cars
Looks like non-small lurrIb cancer to me
Actually that part is a legitimate classification and not part of the AI nonsense. Broadly, lung cancers are classified as either “small cell” cancers or “non small cell” cancers based on how the tumor appears microscopically. The “non small cell” cancers can be further subdivided into various types.
The reason for this distinction between the two is due to the significant difference in clinical management and prognosis. Having “small cell” lung cancer is effectively a death sentence, whereas the other types are a lot more treatable.
What’s up with this AI generated garbage? This post isn’t even half a day old and the article is already down.
It’s still up, just remove trailing dot from DOI
Ahh, a typo! Thank you! I wish it was down tho
Its still there but the links goed trough like 3 proxys and sometimes fails.
Also new theory: auto generate ai slop on official platforms like science research to auto share those on social media as rage bait to then auto sell the “active” account in the furure.
It doesn’t need to be economically feasibly to be sure some people are trying something like it.
True true, AI slop sucks
Where is Saddam?
In the little car. :)
It’s not little, it’s normal-sized in a world where SUVs have become the norm.
Exactly. It’s non-small!
They’re living up to the chinese stereotype unfortunately
That image was generated by AI and edited over. They didn’t even bother correcting all of it or erasing the parts that didn’t make sense.
Ffs, this is blatant.
edited over
What did they edit?
How in the fuck did this pass peer review?
what peer review? This is likely one of the many reviewless journals that solely exist to publish, for a generous fee, shit that wouldn’t even pass as an undergrad homework. people then can write in their CVs for grant applications or position applications in low tier universities etc The name of the journal is usually chosen to look fancy and very international so it looks good on your CV. Honestly there are so many such journals now, no one person would be able to tell which is which, it’s a complete mess. Humans find a way of fucking up everything for profit.
I’m wondering if the editors are actually just ChatGPT
Not even peer review, the problem doesn’t go far enough to reach the level of checking the scientific methodology. Did nobody even read the article before publishing? They don’t have editors in the journal this was published in?
It didn’t
I wonder if they tested this on ridiculously well-endowed rats.
If they did it would be nuts.
Dang, is always the small cars.
The only way to fight small cars is with COVEEENT INHIBTORS
Despite the constant negative press covfefe
Maybe c/FuckCars is on to something.
Small cars are fine, it’s the non-small ones that are cancerous
Turn around, bright eyes.
EGFR and AFATINIB
And I need you now tonight.
And I need you more than ever.
Afatinib is real though
Non-small lung cancer: 🚙
Seems legit.
Everything reminds me of HER2.
NOOO GO AWAY, BIND/TORTURE/KILL KILLER DO NOT GIVE ME CANCER
deleted by creator
Doi seems to be a dead link now?
I can still see it.
text looks sus too
