• xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    luckily the country doesn’t run on executive orders like a dictatorship and we have judges saying things like that still…

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      The first couple might but eventually it will get before the supreme court and it will get rubber stamped

    • Loss@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, it does. And it always has. The executive ultimately has all the power as both other branches have failed to maintain armed forces of their own to enforce the checks and balances.

        • Loss@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, I’m sure they’ll feel great when they’re killed by someone that doesn’t think it’s an illegal order.

            • Loss@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Refusing orders can be seen as treason depending on the circumstances. While the ideal is you disarm and arrest the member to stand trial, if that’s not possible and they present immediate danger lethal force can be used.

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                You seem to be thinking everyone is armed to the teeth pointing weapons at each other at a briefing. It’s usually people sitting at tables or desks like a classroom.

                Edit: weapons usually aren’t even allowed anywhere near briefing rooms

                • Loss@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  I’m well aware, you seem to be either not believing we’re in fascism, or you believe the make believe rules that contain society are divine laws that everyone will always follow.

                  Trump pardoning the j6 group was a signal that as long as you’re loyal to Trump, you will not have legal consequences. That removes the rules, as long as you do the Reich thing.

                  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    13 hours ago

                    I don’t believe either of those things. I still believe they aren’t pointing guns at each other in briefings though. No one would get shot. They would get a court martial. Shooting people within the military would cause splinters quickly that would fragment the presidents power and lay the groundwork for a potential coop attempt. It would be stupid for a dictator to start that.