Summary

The Trump administration’s move to withhold congressionally approved federal funds has sparked legal battles over the Constitution’s “power of the purse,” which grants spending authority to Congress.

Nonprofit groups and over 20 Democratic attorneys general have sued, citing violations of the Impoundment Control Act.

The administration argues the law is unconstitutional, potentially setting up a Supreme Court showdown.

Critics call it a “dangerous power grab,” while legal experts say past rulings limit presidential authority over spending.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a fucking no brainer, any ruling other than, it’s illegal and an invalid executive order is wrong and shows that the court system is corrupt as well.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wait, that’s your litmus test for corruption in the judicial branch? What about… - Gestures wildly -

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Corruption is a sliding scale. There’s accepting gifts from companies corruption ala Thomas, and then there’s clear violations of the constitutional separation of powers corruption, which is a lot worse. Neither are particularly a good look for the courts. But one of them ends in consolidation of power to the executive branch ceding arguably one of the more important responsibilities of congress.

        • Tinidril
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Like handing a presidential election over to George W Bush?

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, that was a really shitty thing to do as well. I don’t think the Supreme Court has the authority to tell states to stop counting votes. I was 12 at the timenof that election tho, so I didn’t understand how consequential it was.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fair point. I’m still pissed that the Supreme Court has basically ruled that president’s are immune to prosecution while in office regardless of what they do. Such a stupid and obvious rule that will get abuse.

        • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The fact that Biden didn’t immediately take advantage of that to purge the court for being blatant enemies of the republic was appalling.