• kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Fuck unfinished titles that are priced at almost a hundred at launch; I’d rather wait a year or two and buy the same thing for 15 EUR.

    Edit: and yes, if you buy those at launch, you are part of the problem.

    • Faulty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      All those hit pieces that were coming out as BG3 was launching were so transparent. “Shit one company is actually putting in effort, make it seem bad somehow”

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I miss expansions. The command & conquer expansions were always better than the base game by far.

    Last true expansion I remember is Blood and Wine from 2016.

  • ApeNo1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Things sure have changed since the old school shareware days with classics like Wolfenstein, Duke Nukem, Doom, etc.

  • Dojan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Don’t you know? This kind of quality is impossible for poor little AAA studios to keep up! We really should just settle for tech demos. :(

  • AbsolutelyNotCats@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    That’s why i don’t game anymore, well that and because I keep getting fucked by young people in multiplayer games

    • GreenMario@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Single player and coop in where it’s at.

      PvP games ain’t fun if the majority of the base doesn’t have work to go to.

      • AbsolutelyNotCats@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Only single player game i enjoyed in the last 10 years was the Witcher 3, i couldn’t even finish GTA V lol.

        I have always been a multiplayer gamer myself, but the state of most games right now (since few years ago) is absolutely disgusting, they’re just made for you to spend points on mtx thanks to skill based matchmaking and other crap, it’s really undercover pay2win unless you are bottom/top 1%.

        I’m just glad i enjoyed every game i could as a child and enjoyed the competitive scene of many FPS when it wasn’t undercover pay2win.

        Now it’s time for 16yo guys on adderall to win and earn millions on twitch

    • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh, I still game, but mostly older games and GotY editions. And Indies.

      AAA titles are dead for me, I want to buy a full game, with no in-game store, no 10ish DLCs available, no always on fuckery etc.

      And if there are 1 or 2 huge expansions (like in Witcher 3) I have no problem with that. I bought expansions in the past, that’s fine.

      • Huschke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I used to be fine with all the shit practices you mentioned since I just wanted to play the games, but then I played Baldurs Gate 3 and remembered how gaming used to be.

        I don’t think I’ll continue to buy DLC-ridden, half-finished and sometimes even outright broken games. Looking at you Diablo 4…

        In that sense the publishers were rightfully afraid of the game. I guess it reminded a lot of us what we lost over the years.

        • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Turns out that a creative director that unapologetically makes exactly the game that they wanted to make is a winning formula.

    • bleistift2@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Indie is the way to go. The number of times I’ve been disappointed with “AAA” games is ludicrous.

      • DashboTreeFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes, been loving BG3 but my best experiences with games in recent years have all been indie, from Outer Wilds that made me completely rethink what a game experience is meant to be, to Vampire Survivors that tickled all the right parts of my brain into making me spend hours watching pixels flash on screen in the most mind-numbingly addictive way. Indie devs really seem to be carrying forward the soul of gaming that larger gaming companies have lost, the exceptions being so rare that Baldur’s Gate 3 is getting lauded for basically meeting what would have been normal expectations for a AA title in the early 2000’s

      • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        You just have to be VERY careful with buying them day 1. I mostly just wait for a “complete edition” or “goty edition” or smth and THEN wait til that is cheap.

        • microphone900@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          This is exactly the way to do it. Well, it’s exactly the way I do it. Yeah I have to wait a little bit but I’d rather have the full experience available, and a discount is a nice bonus, when I start a game than buy it piecemeal.

    • The dogspaw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Man we don’t even get dlc anymore in the past you would get an expansion pack and it would only be like 75 hours of additional content then it became dlc and that was still like the ballad of gay tony undead nightmare now its micro transactions and its a car that was part of the base game that they removed so you can pay for it again

      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        GTA IV DLC was soo good. I was hyped for what theyd do with some smaller stories within GTA V but they never came :(

        • The dogspaw
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Im worried about gta 6 the main story is supposed to be much shorter than gta 5 and there apparently going to be combining the main story dlc with gta online

          • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s not the same Rockstar that was making GTA 1-4 anyways. That ship sailed a long time ago.

            • Sigh_Bafanada@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Let’s be realistic though, modern Rockstar still made RDR2, which was full of heart. Not saying for sure that GTA6 won’t be a cash grab, but modern Rockstar still very much has it in them to make a great game

            • The dogspaw
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              As someone who started playing gta 3 and up rdr bully the warriors its hard to let go of old Rockstar that actually cared about there games

        • zaphod@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Afaik they cancelled the expansions for GTA V because they fucked up the launch of GTA Online and needed to fix that instead.

          • Default_Defect
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Pretty sure they saw the truckloads of cast piling in and realized they could just scrap the expacs and sprinkle its pieces into Online as paid content.

    • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not true, if people buy it the V is in there. And plenty of people throw their money at it, otherwise they’d stop doing that.

      But hey, pre-order our broken game for $70 today! Do it now, because surely the digital copies will run out otherwise.

      • craftyindividual@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Pre order our game that is broken because the director was fired halfway through development, but we insisted on the original release date. Also the coders will get to see their family unharmed again once they’ve released the first patch.

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s what started it all.
      Now you can preorder thier newest game and have it preload the entire game two weeks before you can play it! Because it you’re dumb enough to preorder it you’re probably dumb enough to not want your storage space too.

      Todd Howard is a greedy fuck.

      • Nickn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        You can choose not to preload the game, can’t you? So it’s up to the individual. Besides, why wouldn’t you want to preload the game so when it’s released you can just hop in? I don’t get your angry reasoning here. If you’re gonna play the game then the storage is gonna be occupied either way. Lol

        • Neato@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes. Pre loading is a huge benefit for people with low bandwidth Internet. The usage of storage space is a weird complaint.

  • wrath-sedan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Slaps the hood of Baldur’s Gate 3 this bad boy can fit so many wildly exceeded expectations for a complete AAA-title at launch in 2023

    • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wasn’t it also early access? At least some part of it? Or am I remembering the wrong game.

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m confused why people are upset at early access. It can be done badly to sell a game that isn’t finished for full price.

        But Larian has always done early access this way: first act for testing. And it works great.

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It was early access for like 3 years. Which allowed them to release a fully finished game, or the closest we had from that state since no one remembers when actually.

      • Kuro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The first of three acts was in early access for nearly 3 years

  • Arkarian@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I remember the launch of mass effect 3 in 2012, when EA and Bioware removed all the prothean companion content (very relevant to the story) from the base game and sold it as 10€ day 1 DLC. They even boasted about “releasing a game for 80€” back then IIRC.

      • blackluster117@possumpat.io
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I remember the first time playing Mass Effect 3 in the Legendary Edition and experiencing the story with Javik along with the Leviathan quest line. I’d missed out on a lot of depth and emotional context to the story due to being a broke high schooler when it originally launched.