Summary

Donald Trump reiterated his claim that Canada would be better as the U.S.’s 51st state, citing trade imbalances and lower taxes.

He also announced new 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, including from Canada, despite a recent 30-day reprieve.

Canadian PM Justin Trudeau has not formally responded, but a government source said they await official confirmation.

Trump criticized Canada’s defense spending and border security, despite recent Canadian commitments.

Canada previously retaliated against similar tariffs in 2018 before a 2019 trade deal resolved the dispute.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Stop giving this foolishness air.

    Make preparations on the side. But Stop giving it public attention.

    also understand that Canada would never be a state. It would be a generation or two of Forceful and violent assimilation before any region was given “statehood”. For everyone else, it’s poverty, military occupation, and slavery. Which would mean Insurgency and War.

    Any Canadian advocating for this is either terminally online and uneducated, living life off article title opinions. Or they are functionally a traitor/quisling/5th columnist and a threat to their neighbors, and should kept an eye of. And if things really did go “there”. they’d be the ones taken out first by resistance.

  • jinarched@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m sure he’s enjoying saying that fucking 51st state line over and over like an asshole spraying a cat with water for his own amusement.

    That said, I don’t think he realizes how much people in Canada are pissed and united right now.

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Why would Canada join the US, only to be rewarded with a shitty health care system and a low national minimum wage?

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Elon Musk and the nazi sad boys will just dig up cases, where chain smokers having lung cancer getting treatment, etc. In Hungary, some try to divert the anger created by the constant defunding of healthcare (some of which was done by diverting money into building football stadiums “to encourage children to do sports thus be healthy”) to the sick and the disabled…

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I unapologetically woke up this morning hoping to read that someone took a successful shot at him during the Superbowl.

    Put me on whatever list you wish.

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    This man shits worthless click bait out of his mouth daily, why does media fall for it?

    • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      When the leader of the world’s largest superpower dreams of Anschluss of their otherwise allied neighbour, that’s not clickbait, it’s the state of international policy and diplomacy with the leader the US elected.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fall for it? They’re grateful he’s made their job insanely easy. They used yo have to investigate things and then risk running afoul of the powerful. Now they just have to print whatever the latest outrageous bullshit comes out of Donald’s mouth and reap the clicks and ad dollars.

    • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      What do you want them to do? Not report on the most powerful man in the world? They need to report this, people need to see it

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    What’s in it for Canada? Expensive ineffective healthcare? Why would they go for this?

    • azimir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      Reduced quality of life? Greater danger of being shot in a school? Shorter life expectancy? Lower quality food? And imperial president instead of a democratic one?

      I’m not seeing the upsides for Canada.

  • ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think he seriously under-estimates how many Americans will side with Canada, with force.

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can imagine we’d end up with a bigger army than the US if Canadian service guaranteed citizenship

      • azimir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Poppies. They’d love for you to have a fe poppies on hand. They earned those the hardest way possible.

    • towelie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      He also hasn’t considered the destruction that 30 million occupied dissidents (from a country known for their prolific war crimes) can unleash on their oppressor.

        • towelie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yeah I realized that as I was typing it. Our population grew so damn fast. Granted, three million or so of those don’t have citizenship or permanent residency, and are a rotation of temporary students or workers. A lot are expected to leave (a lot are also expected to becomes PRs).

          3/4 people resisting is probably a pipe dream anyway, so 30 million dissidents from Canada alone isn’t likely in a worst case Ontario.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 day ago

            So you are saying (assuming every US resident will go along with this) that we just have to take out about 10 American’s each?

            I like those odds.

            • chellybeans@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Hey, hey, I’m not going to be against you so what do I need to wave to make sure I’m not one of the 10?

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Honestly? I think just not supporting a war (trade or otherwise) with your long time ally will go quite a way. War in a far away land is one thing, war with your neighbour is another thing all together. As long as americans don’t just shrug and pretend everything is normal this whole idea will go no where.

                On the other hand if it does go in the most stupid direction, prepare for blackouts and attacks on any and all infrastructure. This is not a threat but just a reasonable expectation of a nations activity when in this situation.

          • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            My brain still thinks 30-35 million so all good, was thinking you might be meaning a dissident number as I was writing anyhow, meshes pretty well with that Angus Reid poll about joining the states.

  • gen/Eric Computers@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    How would a whole country be a single state? Wouldn’t it become 13 states (or however many provinces/territories Canada has)?

    • TheRealKuni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      No no, that would give too many senators to people who understand the value of universal healthcare. Can’t have that.

    • SecondaryAnnetagonist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Giving them more than two senators might lead to a senate that isn’t perpetually gridlocked. That makes them dangerously close to being able to pass progressive legislation instead of nothing but mandatory funding bills with 37 pages worth of riders and pork.

      • mercano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Everyone assumes Canada is super liberal country just because of universal healthcare. They forget that Alberta is basically snowy Texas, and the other prairie provinces have more in common with the Midwest than New York.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Everyone assumes every country’s overton window is aligned with the US.

          Canada is no leftist paradise, but their overton window is far more left than the US.

          Bernie would a Canadian centrist, or maybe a left leaning politician, for example.