Summary

JD Vance argued that courts cannot overrule Trump’s executive orders, likening judicial interference to an illegal overreach.

Critics, including lawmakers and legal experts, denounced his claims as unconstitutional.

This debate follows recent federal rulings blocking Trump’s executive actions, including spending freezes and an order ending birthright citizenship.

Opposition figures warned against undermining the judiciary, emphasizing checks and balances.

    • _chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The media is owned by the same billionaires that own the politicians.

      This isn’t a left versus right thing anymore. It’s a have vs the have-nots.

      And there’s a lot more of us have-nots.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        COVID taught us that even two weeks of reduced profits was enough to send a lot of these companies spinning.

        We could literally end this in a month with a general strike, but we’ll never get enough citizens on board with it.

    • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You would think Yale would have something to say. As I see it, a law degree from there is useless, do you even need to be able to read to get in?