^^^

  • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Because a monopoly is a company that operates in their market unopposed. In this instance, it’s not Steam’s fault the opposition kinda sucks (or doesn’t quite aim to be a direct competitor in the case of GoG) but the argument is still there that Steam is sitting as the only distributor for PC.

    Personally, this is why I keep wanting to root for GoG, Epic and such. Monopolies are dangerous to consumers and the markets they operate in. Right now, Steam is being surprisingly effective at remaining a “good guy” but there’s a lot of concern even among Steam fans of what the landscape will look like in a post-Gaben world. Setting the PC gaming market up to have Steam as the only option when that inevitably comes to pass (touch wood that that’s no time soon, of course) could spell a certain level of disaster in a world where the anti-monopoly law-makers have shown to not really care about upholding that standard.

    Edit: missed words. Never type when struggling to keep your eyes open kids!

    • nesc@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There is little to no concern about steam, you can’t even say that they aren’t great (their launcher is horrible for example).

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        There’s absolutely concern about Steam if you’re looking at the discourse. Personally, I hate the Steam launcher and have kept having problems with it ever since they changed the design to be more Baby’s First like everyone else has done (not just taking about launchers here) but the Steam launcher is still better than the others, which is infuriating.