• coyootje@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, I’m not an expert by any means but haven’t the republicans been able to very efficiently stifle democrat majorities before? If they just follow that playbook (delaying things, being pains in the ass, constant insistence on funky rules) they can at least annoy the shit out of them and hopefully slow things down. They’re way too polite for that tho, they’d rather just let it happen and hope they come out okay in the end then to risk the wrath of the annoying orange and his minions.

    • SmokeInFog
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      One thing they could do is stop voting with republicans to confirm Trump’s appointees. Have you seen. how well the Republicans obstruct? They can get everybody in their rank and file out on network TV to call for banning a book by title while the democrats can’t even get their best faces on TV to call what’s happening with NY’s mayor blatant quid pro quo corruption

      EDIT: Trump energy chief says there are upsides to ecological collapse

      • stopdropandprole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        agreed. that’s literally their job. oppose the other party by whatever means at their disposal. use the press, support union actions, so many ideas. be bold be creative.

        they at least should stop pretending that “playing by the rules” and “trusting the system” is an appropriate response to illegal orders, illegal firings, violations of constitutional doctrine, and open defiance of judicial and legislative oversight. relevant video from InnuendoStudio, sadly aged like wine

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can’t filibuster cabinet picks or federal judges, meaning the Dems cannot stop Trump appointees, either. The Republicans have 53 senate seats so they can pass whoever they want.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The GOP needs every single person on their side to pass the nominations… Which rarely happen.

          Why aren’t the dems working whatever GOPers they can to say no? Or is that something only the GOP is allowed to do? Get Dems to defect?

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            False, Hegseth is the closest to losing confirmation when 3 GOP voted no, but VP tiebreaker confirmed him anyways.

            Hegseth, Vought, Gabbard, Kennedy, and Lutnick all recieved 0 dem votes and passed.

            Only 3 Republicans have voted against any confirmation, and Mitch McConnell is the only republican to vote against more than one: he voted against 3.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        1 day ago

        Only if the appointees are bad (which, since it’s Trump and “stuff up the deep state” project 2025, there’s probably a lot of bad appointees). If we obstruct appointees that are good, we’ll just keep seeing the pendulum swinging when a new party comes into power.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Democrats need to pass progressive reform to win. Republicans need to stop progressive reform to win. They’re playing different games.

      For example, Republicans are gutting Medicaid and Medicare in their new budget proposal and the only thing Dems can do is block the bill which will defund those programs regardless.

      Zero win conditions.