• N-E-N@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I suspect that most other actual slaves would not entirely agree with that sentiment

    • Nevoic@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your original stance was that it is “problematic” to equate them. Do you think it was problematic for Fredrick Douglass to equate them? If not then your original position has to change.

      We don’t have polling on prior chattel slave views on wage slavery, but since you’re making a habit of just going with your gut, I’ll do the same. I’d wager most prior chattel slaves would’ve been more than happy to abolish all forms of slavery (including wage slavery).

      • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Douglass died in 1895 when the standard of living was wildly lower than what it is today, its not an equivalent comparison

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Gee, I know I said all that about wage slavery, but who could have predicted iPhones and corn syrup. This is great!”

          Read the shit you’re making claims about.

          • Bloxlord@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why don’t you do the same? Your original quote is 137 years old. It is in fact problematic to equate the economic landscape of 2023 to that of 1886. In that quote Douglass is specifically criticizing the treatment of freed slaves, not capitalism in general. (If you want to convince people capitalism is bad, you need to make valid criticisms, not twist old quotes to suit your narrative)

        • Nevoic@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your stance still needs to change then. Your issue isn’t comparing wage slavery with chattel slavery, it’s comparing slavery when the standard of living has improved.

          Now this stance is still problematic, imagine we lost the civil war and the north became socialist, abolishing wage slavery. The south would have chattel slavery and the north would have no slavery. Now imagine the standard of living for chattel slaves vastly improved, and someone then tried to compare “modern day chattel slaves to wage slaves”. Your stance would then be this is wildly unfair to modern day chattel slaves because wage slaves had a worse standard of living, a position we both understand is ridiculous.

        • explodicle@local106.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Has chattel slavery been replaced with wage slavery for a large population since then? (Actually asking, not rhetorical)

          If living conditions have improved for wage slaves but not for chattel slaves, then I’d imagine they would agree with you.