What was John F. Kennedy referring to when he said “a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy”?

The President and the Press: Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961

Excerpt

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

    • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Who are “they”?

      Russian and Chinese communism

      Yes, both have been forms of authorities rules.

      And in light of OP’s question. To me “they” are all the authoritarians; both the extreme left and right winged.

        • ehpolitical@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          He makes reference to it, but also speaks of some kind of opposition from “around the world” that was working on “expanding its sphere of influence”. He also described this thing as operating in secret, not out in the open. Was Russia operating secretly? (I don’t know much about the Cold War.)

          • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            For those of us who lived through it, what he said was blatantly obvious at the time.

            • DragonTypeWyvern
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              There were people that assumed he meant Jews, but they were always going to think he meant that.

            • ehpolitical@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Makes sense, I was too young to remember most of it. Still, does his description not strike you as resembling what we see happening in the U.S. today?

              • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                15 hours ago

                I disagreed with it at the time and do again now… there’s no grand conspiracy; people are just depressingly predictable in how they respond to economic and cultural pressures. Some people recognize the trends and attempt to ride them or even control them (or stop them), but with a few notable exceptions, history tends to just roll on regardless — which can look to some as if there must be some cabal of puppet masters calling the shots.

                • ehpolitical@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Sorry, do you mean you disagreed with what JFK was saying, that you didn’t believe him?

                  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    I believe his observations were mostly correct, but wouldn’t tie it as closely to a “group” as he did.

          • diphthong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Yes they were operating in secret. There are many examples of their infiltration, such as the Cambridge Five.