There were many lingua francas of which French was supposedly the first global lingua franca. That changed and it became English (from what I understand). We will probably see another language become the lingua franca, so my question is: should it be English? Are there better candidates out there? Why / why not?

  • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I like the idea. My only issue with esperanto are its heavy influence by romance languages

    A substantial majority of its vocabulary (approximately 80%) derives from Romance languages, but it also contains elements derived from Germanic, Greek, and Slavic languages

    That gives Spain, France, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and probably a few other countries quite a leg up. But, with influence from other languages, it would probably diversify its vocabulary (at least I hope so).

    • vesi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Almost all languages have a very big number of words derived from Latin or French. For example Polish, which is a slavic language, has so many of Latin or French rooted words.

      Esperanto apart, I think that German should be the language od Europe, because is it simply the biggest language of the EU. It is also precise. Ofc it could get simplified, because for many der/die/das is too complicated or it is too much of a hustle to remember. German could get more logical with them and then it should be no problem for everyone.

      We could also think about regianal lingua-francas. For example, it could be this way that in the region of romance languages, everyone would speak French, in the region of germanic - German and in the region of slavic - Polish. Simply the biggest languages in a given region.

      The funniest one but also kind of interesting would be Latin. #useLatin

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        English is Germanic, so it’s a pointless change. Latin would be cool I guess, but English is mostly derived from it anyway, just simplified.

        English isn’t going anywhere. It’s too embedded now.

        • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          English isn’t going anywhere. It’s too embedded now.

          That’s what French was until the second world war changed everything.

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            45 minutes ago

            Look at how we are communicating. This is why it won’t change again. The world wasnt connected like it is now.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          but English is mostly derived from it anyway

          IMO English is more Germanic than Latin. There’s certainly a lot of latin/french loanwords, but that’s true for all other Germanic languages, too (even if to a somewhat lesser degree). Romance languages like French and Italian are actually derived from Latin and they are a lot different from English but fairly similar to each other (especially Italian, Spanish and Portuguese).

    • Zloubida@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is not such a big advantage because of the way words are constructed, by gluing words together. So there are fewer words to learn to have the same vocabulary.