There were many lingua francas of which French was supposedly the first global lingua franca. That changed and it became English (from what I understand). We will probably see another language become the lingua franca, so my question is: should it be English? Are there better candidates out there? Why / why not?

  • quatschkopf43@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I think we are at a point now where almost everybody in Europe is able to speak at least some English. So cultural exchange has never been easier. Why make it more difficult again by adding another language people have to learn first?

    • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      As a Brit (but European at heart and strong “Remain” voter), I am quick to remind fellow Brits that English is a language heavily derived from our European ancestors: French, Latin, Germanic (Proto-Germanic, “Old English”, Old Norse, Romance, etc), Greek, Dutch, Spanish, and more.

      I know the United Kingdom has been a royal asshat throughout the centuries but the mark of Europe is intense and undeniable; without Europe, there is no such thing as the English language (except perhaps a number of proper nouns that are rooted in the Celtic people and their ancestors) [Edit: see crappywittyname’s comment below].

      I hope our European siblings can find solace in the fact that “English” is a distinctly European language that is full of words from all of our tongues.

      • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        The Celtic languages are closely related to European languages such as Breton, the ancestor languages having been developed and spoken widely in Europe pre-Roman conquest.
        I’m only being picky because it adds even more support to your (already very fine) argument. You don’t even need that caveat.

  • Vernal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    English is mostly used in commercial now, changing it would be costly and you would need the commitment of many others people to accept a new change in how to approach the world or just Europe, it’s a tipe of commitment I doubt people would be willingly to accept.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s not possible to please everybody so I vote for Basque and pleasing nobody.

    • B-TR3E@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Came here to say that. I intended to propose an immensely complex language that almost nobody understands and that is unrelated to any other family of languages. My choice was Hungarian or Finnish but Euskadi (aka “Basque”) clearly beats it. I had the privilege to learn some words from Basque coworker years ago when I was living in Spain for a while and I swear it is so utterly alien to anything I’ve heard, that it must be of extraterrestrial origin.

    • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Basque might be the most neutral language of them all, right? Does it have a connection with any other European language?

  • plactagonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    No, most people are pragmatic in this case and eastern countries changed from Russian ~30 years ago so another change isn’t coming any time soon.

    As my parents saw the change from “it is really appreciated that you can speak English” to “it is expected that you can use it”. I can tell that it is so engrained in our multinational exchange that it won’t be even desirable.

  • idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    English is a global lingua franca, not just european. And it’s not just because of the american and british influence, but because it’s a relatively easy language.

    Also the translator programs are better and better, this is actually a good and fitting usecase of current LLMs. I think we are not far away from the babel fish.

    • RandomStickman@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      but because it’s a relatively easy language

      I literally cried learning English as a kid lol

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Now try to learn Portuguese, or German, or Russian. English has wonky phonetics, but has a relatively simple grammar. As a bonus it’s not properly standardized, so whatever you come up with is going to be correct in at least one of the existing dialects.

        • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          As someone who learnt both German and English as a second language, German was easier.

          Consistent spelling and pronounciation make a massive difference.

          • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It’s horrible how many German nouns have a female or male gender. Like a lamp is female for some reason, but not if it’s a spot or a chandelier or whatever. This is so stupid and has to be memorized. Why is a bottle female, but not if it’s a flat flask.

            … and French is even more silly.

            • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 hour ago

              It’s called “grammatical gender”. The gender is of the word not what the word represents. It evolved in many different languages meaning it did so for a reason. My guess is that it started with good intentions as many things do have a sex. However, realization crept in that there are far more things on this planet without a sex (or even an identifiable one) and something had to be done. Probably it didn’t sound good either.

              There are also languages where the concept of gender (not just grammatical gender, but gender itself) doesn’t exist and they have no gendered pronouns (everyone and everything is an “it” --> “the man, it moved”, “the woman, it sang”, …).

              Languages are fascinating from a purely theoretical standpoint.

              • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                It even existed in Old and Middle english, upto the 1500s.

                Some nouns still have genders in english. But this is more an exception than a rule. Ie. a ship/boat is female (called “she”), while nature is also feminine (often personified as “Mother nature”).

          • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Consistent spelling and pronunciations but even native speakers get pronouns for certain nouns wrong sometimes.

            And as for German being consistent there are still situations like Umfahren (Drive around) and Umfahren (Run over) that are written the same but pronounced different.

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Plus English has influences from everywhere. In my oral abitur exam, I got stuck once or twice and made up words by anglicizing the pronounciantion of french words gaining extra points and impressed faces.

          • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That works for almost all European languages. In one of his books Richard Feynman tells a story about when he went to Brazil and didn’t how to say “so” in Portuguese so he used “Consequentemente” by adapting Consequently and everyone was impressed with his fluency.

            • MBM@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 minutes ago

              I feel like that’s just a tall tale that Feynman told the author, like most of those stories

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The grammar is fairly simple, but spelling is a total train wreck and an unparalleled nightmare of inconsistencies and convoluted rules. As long as you don’t have to read or write anything, there’s not much to cry about.

      • idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Me too, but later I learned a bit of german and latin. The thing is you can fake english easily, like “why use lot word when few do trick” is a totally understandable sentence. Word order is not as stict as in german, no cases, no grammatical genders, verb tenses are mostly optional. Pronunciation is messed up though.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah, English Grammer is basically just Germanic (not to be confused with the Germanic language German, which is just another Germanic language, not the origin). Our words though are not. Most of the words that make up most of our sentences are still their Germanic versions, but talking about specific things could use words from dozens of languages. This makes pronunciation really challenging, because you can’t just know the origin from looking at it, and even if you can it might have shifted from that.

    • vesi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I HATE the idea that we would have some Kind of built into us translators. Languages are a crucial part of human development and, therefore, they should be learned in school the old way. (Ofc school must also evolve)

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Every ‘real’ languare has wild parts. there are constructed languares that don’t but if they became common wild parts will likely be added over time.

    • idefix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I root for Spanish! Creating a bridge with my Latino friends and thus upsetting the US at the same time.

  • Lemmist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Esperanto is a nice variant: it is much more adequate that any of those chaotically evolved “natural” languages plus nobody would have an unfair advantage just because of being lucky to be born in the English speaking country.

    • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I like the idea. My only issue with esperanto are its heavy influence by romance languages

      A substantial majority of its vocabulary (approximately 80%) derives from Romance languages, but it also contains elements derived from Germanic, Greek, and Slavic languages

      That gives Spain, France, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and probably a few other countries quite a leg up. But, with influence from other languages, it would probably diversify its vocabulary (at least I hope so).

      • vesi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Almost all languages have a very big number of words derived from Latin or French. For example Polish, which is a slavic language, has so many of Latin or French rooted words.

        Esperanto apart, I think that German should be the language od Europe, because is it simply the biggest language of the EU. It is also precise. Ofc it could get simplified, because for many der/die/das is too complicated or it is too much of a hustle to remember. German could get more logical with them and then it should be no problem for everyone.

        We could also think about regianal lingua-francas. For example, it could be this way that in the region of romance languages, everyone would speak French, in the region of germanic - German and in the region of slavic - Polish. Simply the biggest languages in a given region.

        The funniest one but also kind of interesting would be Latin. #useLatin

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          English is Germanic, so it’s a pointless change. Latin would be cool I guess, but English is mostly derived from it anyway, just simplified.

          English isn’t going anywhere. It’s too embedded now.

          • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            English isn’t going anywhere. It’s too embedded now.

            That’s what French was until the second world war changed everything.

            • warm@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Look at how we are communicating. This is why it won’t change again. The world wasnt connected like it is now.

              • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Never say never. Many things can change. English became the lingua franca in a single generation. Someone born in the 50s is old enough to remember a different lingua franca.

                The US could align itself with Russia and create such animosity that people not only eschew its products but also the language. Right-wingers could get so much power and become so radical that they demand English be abolished as it tarnishes their own language. China could swoop in, nuke Western powers, and establish a new world order with Mandarin as the world language. An unexpected geological event could pollute the skies and seas in and around Europe, force massive emigration to Africa and Asia, and African governments could unite to declare Arabic, Swahili, and Zulu as the main languages of Africa for all to learn. Brain to computer interfaces might become so widespread that an intermediate and more practical, universal brainwave language is used instead of English (see Gibberlink for inspiration).

                • warm@kbin.earth
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Yeah, of course, not impossible, but we won’t change from it just because. There would have to be a real reason, like as you say, crazy technology advancements or an insane apocalypse makes its widespread use die out.

                  People have never been this connected, so it’s not going to change anywhere near as easily as it has in the past, is my point.

          • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            but English is mostly derived from it anyway

            IMO English is more Germanic than Latin. There’s certainly a lot of latin/french loanwords, but that’s true for all other Germanic languages, too (even if to a somewhat lesser degree). Romance languages like French and Italian are actually derived from Latin and they are a lot different from English but fairly similar to each other (especially Italian, Spanish and Portuguese).

      • Zloubida@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        This is not such a big advantage because of the way words are constructed, by gluing words together. So there are fewer words to learn to have the same vocabulary.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Yes. It’s easy and already established. There is no reason to change it.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    We will probably see another language become the lingua franca

    That’s gonna take a while. Chinese is an unlikely candidate due to how difficult it is to learn to speak and especially read and write, despite the rising international influence of the Chinese state. And I rather doubt that Europe’s Germanic-speaking countries will stop using English as a lingua franca anytime soon, it’s just too easy to learn for them compared to any other possible candidate.

    Let’s hope it’s not going to be Russian anytime soon.

    Something like Esperanto would be a nice alternative for the EU, though. Maybe there’s other artificial languages that are even better? I’m not well-versed in this topic.

    • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s gonna take a while

      French was replaced within 60-80 years. Such change isn’t fast, unless forced. However, I don’t know how it could be forced. We aren’t in a feudalistic system anymore and EU interests are heavily influenced by an English-speaking upper class.

      And I rather doubt that Europe’s Germanic-speaking countries will stop using English as a lingua franca anytime soon, it’s just too easy to learn for them compared to any other possible candidate.

      Try this.

      Let’s hope it’s not going to be Russian anytime soon.

      One can only hope, not only because of the implications, but also because the language is very complicated IMO. Their case system is horrific.

        • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Depends. They have six cases, which is standard for a lot of indogermanic languages, and their declension is mostly consistent. I never learned German as L2, but I imagine the fact that in German cases are not clearly marked on the noun but by the combination of article and noun and that we use two different but very similar marking systems depending on context as utter nightmarish for L2 learners.

  • circledot@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    English is good for the reasons pointed out. Also: It’s no language of the EU (at least for now) so no country gets an edge over the others which should be considered too. (I’m a native German speaker)

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They should just stick with speaking American.

    /Dodges shoes and runs away