• Draces@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    He waited way too long for the party to pick someone other than the de facto choice which is the vp. He cost Dems their primary. So no. I think she gave Dems the best shot they had given the position Biden put them in.

      • Draces@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        That’s ridiculous. Biden dropped out at the end of July. If you expect candidates to run a primary and a presidential campaign in 4 months, in America, you seriously misunderstand how informed the average voter is. People knowing who Kamala is is a big part of why she was the only valid candidate at the time

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          4 months is more than enough time to run a primary and a presidential campaign. Entire countries do it in 6 weeks. The party didn’t want to do it because the party wanted to put in their chosen candidate.

          • Draces@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Entire countries do it in 6 weeks when they know it’s happening well ahead of time and both candidates start campaigning 6 weeks ahead of time. That’s unfortunately not how US elections work.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              That’s not how us elections work because that’s how the parties want us elections to work. Maybe more importantly that’s how the US media wants elections to work. It is easily doable though. Once more we all knew the election was coming and the convention hadn’t even happened yet. Easily enough time. Easily. They didn’t want it to happen.

              • Draces@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                14 hours ago

                Yes. If things worked differently then something different could have happened. What’s your point? How does anything you said relate to the reality of the position Biden left Dems in?

                • njm1314@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  My point is the Democratic party chooses to run it this way. You can’t defend them by saying that’s the way it is, it’s the way it is because they want it that way. They choose it. They can change it whenever they want.

                  So saying there wasn’t enough time is factually incorrect. There was enough time. Easily. They just chose not to do it. This is the position the Democrats wanted.

                  • Draces@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    Democrats do not make election laws. Those are an amalgamation of historic Federal and State policy. There are different requirements and deadlines per state to get on ballots. This isn’t about a single party. They did not have time to run a primary. That is a massive undertaking, printing the ballots alone requires significant forethought. If the laws were different maybe they would have had time but that’s totally irrelevant. We’re not playing Calvinball we’re talking about what could have happened.