White House officials said the installation was an effort to increase internet availability at the complex. They said that some areas of the property could not get cell service and that the existing Wi-Fi infrastructure was overtaxed.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    2 days ago

    “some areas of the property could not get cell service”

    Like the bunkers? Like hell did the white house not have cell service.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can believe areas of the White House have no cell service, on purpose. Remember when they found those fake cell towers around DC?

      https://www.wired.com/story/dcs-stingray-dhs-surveillance/

      I bet at some point they installed some cell phone jammers specifically to limit the amount of foreign spying that could be done by fake towers, and they simply “forgot” to tell the incoming Trump administration…

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 day ago

        probably more likely they fired the original IT team and replaced them with Muskite interns

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also how did they let that excuse get past the technical teams who should be implementing this? They added Star Link to the data center that supports the White House and then have traffic run through hard wires. This does absolutely nothing to improve spots with bad WiFi.

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Plenty of federal facilities have garbage reception. I think it’s probably due to the bureaucracy involved in telecoms installing their hardware on sensitive property. The White House in particular probably has lots of thick walls/armor attenuating signals, too.