Computer scientist won’t give up fight to copyright AI-made art after court loss.

While I am glad this ruling went this way, why’d she have diss Data to make it?

To support her vision of some future technology, Millett pointed to the Star Trek: The Next Generation character Data, a sentient android who memorably wrote a poem to his cat, which is jokingly mocked by other characters in a 1992 episode called “Schisms.” StarTrek.com posted the full poem, but here’s a taste:

"Felis catus is your taxonomic nomenclature, / An endothermic quadruped, carnivorous by nature; / Your visual, olfactory, and auditory senses / Contribute to your hunting skills and natural defenses.

I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations, / A singular development of cat communications / That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection / For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection."

Data “might be worse than ChatGPT at writing poetry,” but his “intelligence is comparable to that of a human being,” Millet wrote. If AI ever reached Data levels of intelligence, Millett suggested that copyright laws could shift to grant copyrights to AI-authored works. But that time is apparently not now.

  • Lazhward@lemmy.worldEnglish
    11·
    11 hours ago

    you just can’t afford things like electricity, sewage treatment and antibiotics. We only have those things because of the economies of scale that society allows.

    We have those things because people do the required labour, economies of scale make it require less labour, but one can’t afford it because it’s privatized. Why wouldn’t people do this simply for the benefit of humanity?

    genetically greedy, so we must genocide that out of the population

    What’s with the disgusting eugenics? Just expropriate their wealth.

    At some point someone built that house.

    Yeah people built a lot of houses, so let’s use them? And build more if needed?

    it’s difficult and miserable on a relatively small number of people. Those people probably aren’t going to keep farming at industrial scale for the fun of it.

    Right, so let’s distribute the burden of this labour instead of having a small number of people do it for a lifetime.

    We do the job at all because if we don’t, it’ll cause a few million cases of cholera. Who do you think should pay for the hose that guy is using?

    Since the labour protects all of us, all of us collectively. Again, for the benefit of humanity and let’s distribute the burden.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      1·
      10 hours ago

      Why wouldn’t people do this simply for the benefit of humanity?

      Because the good of humanity doesn’t heat the house or put dinner on the table. Never has and never will. If you were a human, you’d have learned that from experience.

      What’s with the disgusting eugenics? Just expropriate their wealth.

      Some of that is exaggeration for comedic effect. “Okay, thanos snap every rich person everywhere is gone, we’ve solved greed. Now what?” But also…have we ever tried exterminating the rich? I think I’ve got a hypothesis here worth testing.

      Right, so let’s distribute the burden of this labour

      Who gets to make the decisions as to how?

      Again, for the benefit of humanity and let’s distribute the burden.

      Well now we’re getting into some Robert Heinlein. Service Guarantees Citizenship! Would you like to know more?

      I believe he once backed down a little bit on the requirement for military service, in favor of civil service in general. And I can kinda get behind that. You want to have a say in how society is run? Go spend 6 years as a mailman or a middle school janitor. Go be an NTSB accident investigator or one of those folks working in the USDA’s kitchens testing canning recipes for safety. Those are the folks who should be running the show.

      • Lazhward@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        10 hours ago

        Because the good of humanity doesn’t heat the house or put dinner on the table. Never has and never will. If you were a human, you’d have learned that from experience.

        I don’t know man, money doesn’t heat my home or grow food. It’s the skilled maintenance worker who fixes the central heating, the farmers growing my food and the logistics personnel ensuring it ends up on the supermarket shelves. It’s just good people doing the work that needs doing, I don’t think it’s a given that anyone needs monetary compensation for that.

        Who gets to make the decisions as to how?

        This is why we invented democracies.

        Those are the folks who should be running the show.

        Haha, hell yeah! Just imagine decision makers having actual experience doing useful labour, I imagine things would turn out better indeed! :)