• futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    31 minutes ago

    He really does have a stunted vocabulary. There’s nothing in his head but vanity, greed and pig-ignorance, and a compulsion to be subby to Putin.

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This is a great example of what is, to me, the most bizarre part of this bizarre timeline - this stinky-assed overgrown toddler actually believes this.

    The way it works in his warped mind:

    • He wants to annex Canada, therefore annexing Canada is just and right and proper and smart and best, because everything he wants automatically is. (And a side note - his Kremlin handlers almost certainly planted the idea of annexing Canada in his mind in the first place, though it’s an open question whether he knows that or not).
    • Canada unsurprisingly opposes annexation.
    • But it’s his idea (not really, but that’s a distinction he’s not equipped to make), therefore it’s the bestest and beautifulest and perfectest idea ever in the history of ever, and Canada’s just being nasty and disagreeable about it.

    And that’s it. That’s the extent of the thinking in his overgrown toddler mind - "I want and you won’t give so you’re mean.

    • NotLemming@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      He said they would be the most objectified… I mean, valued state, and so, just like a good woman they should bask in his praise and do whatever he wants. Otherwise they are a nasty whore.

      • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Ooh… nicely spotted.

        That’s a thing with his spoiled toddler emotional dysfunction that I’ve recognized but never really given a lot of thought to. He self-evidently has some seriously warped ideas regarding sex, but they don’t fit neatly into a toddler worldview, since toddlers are ignorant of sex. So I knew there was some way that he’d essentially adapted sexual desire to that extreme degree of emotional immaturity, but hadn’t sorted out exactly what it is.

        And everything clicked with the idea of objectification. I have no doubt that that’s the link I hadn’t sussed out.

        And it’s undoubtedly been recursive - like he started out objectifying women and thus treating their refusal to have sex with him the same way that another toddler would treat mom’s refusal to buy him a candy bar at the supermarket - but then over time developed a set of more specific ideas to better frame things - like “nasty” as a descriptor of someone who refuses his advances - which then melded back into his broader worldview.

        When I wrote that last one, I had a hard time fitting “nasty” in. He’s obviously using it to represent bad/mean/awful, but the word has a specific spin that I couldn’t quite get a grip on, since it doesn’t seem to quite match up with any of the common usages I was considering.

        And I have zero doubt that you’re right - that inside his own head, it’s playing the same role it would in the phrase “nasty whore.” And for the same reason - from his cripplingly self-absorbed viewpoint, he’s already recited the incantations about how beautiful she is and how cherished she’ll be, so it’s time for her to lie back and submit. And the nasty whore refuses…

        • NotLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah, I recognised it immediately by his body language and facial expression, tone of voice etc. That creepy coaxing…yuck. It’s actually kinda rare to see in the wild because someone would have to have zero insight to act that way so brazenly.

          • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Ah… that makes sense.

            Even with my fascination with character analysis and the rich vein of freakishness Trump provides, I generally can’t watch him - he’s just too creepy and unsettling.

            • NotLemming@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Same. Especially when he does the exaggerated and arrogant sneering ‘voices’. Kaamaalaaa.

              It’s weirdly like how some people talk down to children.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Hey UK and Australia and New Zealand and other commonwealth nations: you should sign a mutual defense pact, if that’s not already a thing, and it specifically should not include the US. Invite some other euros too, if you can get them.

  • Panamalt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The Cunt’s really trying to take over the world by merely whining about it like a spoiled brat discovering happy meal toys

      • espentan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        15 hours ago

        What’s the feeling over there… if Trump tomorrow announced a military invasion to free Canada from fascists or whatever, would the military comply and start gunning down Canadians? I know there are a few more steps to it before such action can be taken (or at least I hope there are), so I suppose what I’m wondering is if there are enough Americans who think Canada is evil to happily rise to the challenge?

        An absurd thought, but these are absurd times.

        • Maiq@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I’d fight for Canadian sovereignty. It would be a fight against my own oppressors. I expect if the US invades Canada WWIII would begin to be a hot war instead of this cold/proxy war it has been. Would think Europe would not stand idly either. They would have no choice. They know that the US and russia would begin to carve up Europe next.

          • Mirshe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            14 hours ago

            There’s also the fact that Canada is not nuclear-armed, but they sure as hell are nuclear-capable. They know how to build nukes, they have the infrastructure and manufacturing to do so, the country has simply chosen not to do so over the years.

        • sistarena@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Average Americans don’t want to fight Canada and if they were forced to they would resist every way they could. However, MAGA’s are extremely susceptible to propaganda and if Trumps administration is serious about invading Canada they would turn up the propaganda machine. This interview is propaganda, so the start of that. I don’t think a majority of Americans would ever want to fight Canada, especially since it’s so clear America is the aggressor. It’s also possible Trump and Musk will implode their administration before they can change public opinion enough for it to be feasible.

        • NotLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Go read the conservative subreddit. They’re still fully delusional, assuming they’re real people.

        • officermike@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I have little doubt Pete Hegseth would gargle Trump’s balls if requested and would absolutely command the military to do unspeakable shit. I don’t have any idea what the average service member would do, but I would hope there’d be some internal resistance.

  • sistarena@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I haven’t seen anyone talk about this and I think it needs to be considered. When considering this clip, consider how trumps supporters will see it.

    What we know about Trump supporters:

    • trumps supporters have turned off their critical thinking skills
    • Many of them have below an 8th grade reading level
    • They always have Fox News or another right wing news source turned on - they are addicted to it
    • They already like and trust Trump, and believe him to be some kind of mastermind
    • They are not a majority, but there is a concerning amount of them

    That means what they will get from this clip is:

    • Canada should have already belonged to the US
    • The US has a right to Canada
    • Because trump called Canadians “nasty”, there is a reason to invade Canada, and Canadians deserve it
    • Canada has a lot of resources that the US can use.

    To most people, Trump sounds like an imbecile, but to his supporters, he sounds like he knows what he’s talking about, I personally think he feeds them reasons to be upset without actually making any logical arguments. We all can see that but his supporters can’t. What I’m trying to get at is MAGA’s public opinions about Canada will change because of this interview. This isn’t just bumbling Trump giving a bizarre interview, it’s intentional propaganda to change his viewers’ allegiances.

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, and what kind of response would that get? I’m sure Trump’s handlers would love to make him a martyr and have justification for going to war.

      • Logi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I really don’t think Canada should take the first shot. Surely there must be some capable people on the US side.

    • ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      He’s awful confident it’s a good plan, so they fully intend to make that a non-issue in elections. We are going to have to fight for our right to vote in the next election.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Better yet. Let’s make the border between the two countries fluid. Any US state that borders Canada, or any Canadian province that borders the US, can vote to switch countries at any time. Require a large 2/3 majority threshold. Which nation does a better job providing for its citizens? I say we let states/provinces decide for themselves and vote with their feet.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        This is actually a really good idea. Make national scale regions fluid so that you can create them and merge them together as desired and make it Democratic. Bolo’bolo suggests something similar

  • Jona (they/them)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Ohhh you’ve been a nasty girl Canada~

    Come join daddy and help him out, nasty girl that you are, you’re meant to be mine~


    Sorry for my thoughts, I’ll see myself out

  • 60d@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    America has been subsidizing Canada

    2024: Canada imports ~$480 billion total from the USA. Divided by 40 million Canadian population, that’s $12,000 for every man, woman, and child spent on American shit.

    USA imports ~$586 billion from Canada. Divided by 400 million population, that’s only $1,465 per capita, and that’s only 1/8th of the amount that Canadians bought from the USA in return.

    ##BUY CANADIAN, BE FAIR!

    You can’t compare apples to apples when one side of the equation has 10 times the population. If we’re trying to be fair, Trumpistan needs to buy 8 times more Canadian shit!

    Tariffs on the Canadian side will be reciprocal and will only serve to make us stop buying Murcan shit, leading to an even bigger Trumped-up deficit and the loss of their biggest, best customer. Likely long-term.

  • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Wonder why he doesn’t want Mexico as the 51st state?

    Or puerto Rico?

    Or anything else South or across an ocean?

    • Maiq@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Mexico poses no threat. Easily controlled by throwing it further into disarray, backing a cartel or installing some other dictatorial wannabe. What we have always done south of the border.

      Canada poses a threat because of it’s ability to remain sovereign. It has shown itself to be able to retain a functional democracy independent of US and kremlen influence. For the most part anyway. If Canada joins the EU, Krasnov’s enemy in on his doorstep which makes it even more important they try and succeed to become part of the EU before Krasnov supplants all democracy in the US which is likely before the midterms.

      There is also the fact that he sees Canada: white, Mexico: brown. Racism defiantly playing a huge factor in his every decision.

      Puerto Rico is a US territory already, he doesn’t care about. Not rich or white enough.

      Across the ocean, I think he is interested in South Africa. Musks homeland. Possibly a strategic place for invading Australia when Krasnov and putin start their martch.

      He has already expressed interest in Greenland. Natural resources and military advantage, keeping Europe separated from Canada/US when the new Axis of Ameri-rus begin to march.

      Trump is not smart enough to set the chessboard but competent enough to follow orders from the kremlen.

      Just some thoughts on what might be behind the motivation to annex Canada, Greenland and possibility South Africa.