• Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    The flower bouquet at the end convinced me this is unto itself another comic making a loss reference while making fun of the concept of the comic “loss”

    • Lininop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Haha yeah that’s a solid plan for the first time in a long time ago and I think it was a good idea to go to the same place if you guys are going to be a part of the job.

        • NewLeaf@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hey I just got home from work and I have to go to the store and get a hold of you and I will be there in about an hour to be a little late to get the car back from the house and I can get it from you and I will be there around 10 or so if you want to come over and get it

  • BGDelirium [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve been an internet forum lurker for well on 20-25 years. I see stupid “is this loss” posts every so often. I don’t get it and I never will.

    :angry Abe Simpson yelling at cloud:

    • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s just a neat little shibboleth for terminally online nerds. There isn’t a real joke anymore - like originally it was mocking a terrible webcomic, but at this point the joke is that you recognise the webcomic. It’s a more intricate and creative version of the game

    • EpicKebabEater [he/him, it/its]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s for posts that fit the following criteria(parentheses are how it relates to the original comic, cw: it has implications of miscarriage):

      -4 panels

      -first panel has one person(Dude rushing to the hospital)

      -second panel has two people(Dude talking to the nurse)

      -third panel has two people(Dude talking to the doctor)

      -fourth panel has a person standing and a person laying down(dude seeing his wife in the hospital bed)

      You can replace the people with objects or shapes as long as they vaguely resemble a human silhouette.

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s sort of like a pun with a slightly elaborate setup, except instead of playing with the patterns in words it’s playing with patterns in images. Basically, the joke is that it’s an elaborate setup for a very stupid payoff.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      You really need to (a) have followed the comic fifteen years ago when it was relevant or (b) seen the HBomberGuy recap video to understand it.

      But the TL;DR; of the original joke is that the webcomic was this incel tier whiny gamer wall-of-text throw away web comic. But it managed to produce a singular momentary deeply moving piece of real art.

      Imagine flipping through Ben Garrison comics for five years and then - literally right after a panel of Joe Biden firing a giant turd labeled TAX HIKES into AOC’s mouth, Garrison decides to produce a fully rendered pointelist abstract on par with Starry Night. Or catching Charlie Kirk doing this hypnotic interpretive dance evoking the pain experienced by a young girl falling out of love with her first boyfriend. Or Bill Maher cutting from some panel rant about millennials to do Moonlight Sonata.

      It was such an incredible jarring shift in tone and quality, and one that vanished as quickly as it appeared. It wasn’t based on any kind of real life event, just a moment of deep personal drama the author felt the need to explore in an otherwise totally superficial piece of navel gazing bullshit.

      In some sense, it was self commentary. The idea of a better piece of art, dead before it was even born. Known but not seen or heard or felt, saving in the soul.

      One word to describe what could have been.

      Loss.

      Everything that came after is just jokes referencing the absurd unanticipated masterpiece.

      • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also funny to me that the author was such a smug-ass freeze-gamer type and now all anyone remembers of his formerly super popular webcomic is the very poorly done miscarriage drama.

        I also remember that time he made a racist joke and tried to awkwardly edit it out, though hitler-detector

        • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          all anyone remembers of his formerly super popular webcomic is the very poorly done miscarriage drama

          I mean, I consider that comic the unintentional high point of his career. He had a following, but was always sorta mid-tier. His technique was decent but never great and I don’t think he ever brought into the professional industry.

          But Loss was a genuine powerful piece of work. If he’s going to be remembered for anything, it should be that.

      • Tastysnack [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So the original freeze-gamer author of loss actually lost their child to miscarriage and the comic itself is about that?

        I can’t find anything to say that’s the case but I personally agree with this criticism:

        It has received negative reception from critics and webcomic creators, especially for the shift in tone in the webcomic, and as an example of “fridging”—showing a killed or injured female character with the intention of provoking a male character.

        Cos if the author is a bad gamer chud then that’s exactly what he did do lets be honest and that’s disgusting.

        I feel weird that my take on this is dependent on whether the author lost a child because without that context its absolutely “fridging” but surely someone can lament a loss of a child in a family or a friend and put that emotion into art? Arghhh it’s so confusing and I remember that comic being super edgy so it feels more “see people lose kids and you women want abortions?!” sort of veiled political energy.

  • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just one of those things that was funny exactly once and people outside the loop will mimic it forever so that they feel included