If rehabilitation is the point of our justice system, government agencies shouldn’t punish people who’ve paid their debt, and who are trying to do the right thing.

Altimont owns Carmen’s Corner Store in Hagerstown, Maryland, a community where around 20 percent of people rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to buy their groceries. But a federal agency decided that Altimont can never accept SNAP as a form of payment at Carmen’s.

That decision isn’t because Altimont has done anything wrong as a business owner, but rather because of unrelated crimes from 2004, for which he’s already served his time.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) permanently bans anyone with drug, alcohol, tobacco, or firearms convictions from participating in the SNAP program—a harsher punishment than the agency dishes out to those who have actually defrauded the program. That’s not just irrational, it’s also unconstitutional, which is why Altimont teamed up with our organization, the Institute for Justice (IJ), to file a federal lawsuit against the agency on Tuesday.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    59·
    10 months ago

    You would think that an idea to reduce recidivism and thus reduce crime, like rehabilitation over punishment, would be popular in a democratic system, it’s a real problem that it isn’t. A bunch of states are dealing with this as there’s a backlash for bail reform.

    People just think punishing crime more reduces crime more and it’s not (necessarily) correct. And in a democratic system we reward what people think is true over what is true.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      22·
      10 months ago

      It’s silly because it doesn’t matter how bad the punishment is if every criminal from petty to professional thinks “I’ll never get caught”. They aren’t even considering a possibility of failure, and thus the consequences will never be a deterrent to their actions.

      Once they get to prison, no amount of human rights abuses is going to magically make them into upstanding citizens. But somehow people think that if prison is a bad place nobody would want to go back. While that’s true, it’s a naive point of view from people who have never stopped to think about how someone freshly released from jail earns money or pays rent or buys necessities.

      If, as a society, we truly care about reducing crime and not just punishing criminals out of a sense of twisted vengeance, we should be prioritizing rehabilitation and reform, rather than letting prisoners who could otherwise be saved languish in a system that seems to be okay with criminal gangs having total control of the social hierarchy on the inside.

      • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
        2·
        10 months ago

        They definitely consider failing. They just don’t care because crime is the most realistic option with those facing poverty or addiction. Sure DUI, and shoplifters probably think they won’t get caught but I guarantee you’ll find the best paralegals on the planet in the most dangerous cities in the US.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      18·
      10 months ago

      You can thank the Prison Industrial Complex for sponsoring the Republican “Tough on Crime” propaganda. Reactionary idiots think there’s a one step solution to all of society’s ills, and if it doesn’t work, it’s the other political party that made it fail!

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        71·
        10 months ago

        Dems are fully on board with the tough on crime bullshit, even if they do stand against discriminatory punishment. They want to be tough on everyone equally.

    • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
      13·
      10 months ago

      People just think punishing crime more reduces crime more and it’s not (necessarily) correct. And in a democratic system we reward what people think is true over what is true.

      This is one of those rare instances that (to them) punishment is openly the point. It doesn’t matter that there are ways to save money and increase everyone’s quality of life in the process. And it doesn’t hurt that an entire industry has grown to steal money from the state to punish these people and a small portion is put back into advertising/lobbying to make sure the cycle continues.

    • centof@lemm.eeEnglish
      7·
      10 months ago

      In addition to people somewhat naturally wanting to punish crime, A lot of people like to feel superior to others in any way they can. That way they can be internally excuse their own shortcomings.

      Ex: I may be unsuccessful but at least I’m not a druggie, criminal, black, or a heathen. Too many Americans would rather hate and suppress someone in different circumstances rather than help them out.

    • sab@kbin.social
      7·
      10 months ago

      I’m afraid a lot of people don’t even care if it’s working - they just think being “though on crime” makes society masculine and cool (and preferably white). They’d vote for it even if they knew it’s bad policy.