“It is a complicated issue. It is truly a complicated issue, with a wide range of views, truly a wide range of views,” Jean-Pierre said. “There is no ‘yes or no’ answer to this, it is complicated. There is a rule that the Department of Education [DOE] has put forward, and we’re going to let that process move forward, and again, we want to make sure that while we establish guardrails with this rule, we also prevent discrimination, as well, against transgender kids. But again, a complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that.”

“Absolutely no reason for the Biden admin to do this,” New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote. “It is indefensible and embarrassing. The admin can still walk this back, and they should. It’s a disgrace.”

“Honestly, this move by Biden to push a rule on trans kids in sports is not only a backwards betrayal, it [forces] us to have to spend our time dealing with god d*** sports instead of criminal bans on our healthcare,” Alejandra Caraballo, a civil rights attorney and LGBTQ+ advocate, wrote. “He could have just done nothing. This is legitimizing transphobia.”

The mOsT PrOgReSsIvE Administration in History™ funny-clown-hammer “A complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that” funny-clown-hammer Fuck off out of here with that “centrist” nonsense. There’s nothing complicated about it, and it’s not an issue unless you want to turn it into one and want to appeal to people’s emotions like Republicans are doing. It was only a matter of time before they’d start throwing trans people under the bus. I guess with the coming elections it’s as good a time as ever.

  • betelgeuse [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just in case anyone from other instances are stopping by, this is how liberal democracy leads to fascism. You have a right wing party that wants to criminalize being trans while tacitly supporting physical violence and extermination. The only viable opposition party can’t even use decisive language about the validity and existence of trans people among cis people. Because it might hurt their polling.

    Now the strongest, political position from the “left” is “it’s complicated.” So when the right starts being very clear about violence and carrying it out through official state entities, the new left position will be even more to the right. Because they already gave up on “Trans people should participate in the things cis people do.” So it’s not even about trans people living a normal life. Historically, by the time we get there, it doesn’t matter what the left position is anymore. Because the right has taken over and are putting people in camps.

    This is why it’s so very annoying to hear about harm reduction and voting the lesser evil. That’s not how it works. One hand washes the other. The lesser evil just leads to greater evil getting strong anyways. It doesn’t stop it or bide you time. The only lesser evil is violent revolution, which is only evil if you don’t understand what’s at stake here.

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m one of those people from other instances stopping by that hasn’t thought a lot about this issue.

      It’s a shame that US politics seems to be so boolean. As in, the only acceptable position for a political party is the polar opposite of their opposition.

      What if an issue is genuinely complicated and cannot be resolved by a three word statement of position? Can there be no discussion around that?

      • KarlBarqs [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        What if an issue is genuinely complicated and cannot be resolved by a three word statement of position? Can there be no discussion around that?

        That’s fine if it’s an issue that is worthy of debate.

        We’re talking here specifically about the rights and survival of human beings, and in that kind of case, no. There is no room for debate. There is no complexity. You either support people’s right to live, or you don’t. There fundamentally cannot be a grey area here; any response that includes the words “yes, but” automatically cedes ground to fascists.

      • betelgeuse [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s not complicated because the issue is complicated. It’s complicated because the spokesperson for the leader of the Democratic party has to be careful with what she says. It’s complicated because saying yes pisses of the alleged moderate majority who disagree with saying yes. It’s complicated because saying no pisses off the progressive and shits on the pro LGBTQIA+ image of the party. You can’t strip away the politics of the situation or do a thought experiment where cows are spheres and there’s no friction. The situation and answer can only be understood in the actual context within which it exists, along with the historical moment and broader context.

        It is not complicated because letting trans teens play on the same team as cis teens is a deeply complicated issue that cannot be resolved with a slogan.

        And I just explained that it’s not boolean. It’s not 1 and 0, it’s just 0. And the minute someone tries to suggest 1 instead, the people more concerned that people might have the wrong opinions about complexity show up. We’re trying to make the discussion more nuanced and complicated, it’s the moderates and adults in the room stopping us.

      • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        If you haven’t thought a lot about this issue, then you may not be aware that the issue is nothing but complete transphobia. It is not “complicated” the science is actually very clear and the only reason to be against trans people in sports is bigotry and claiming its “complicated” is supporting that bigotry

      • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        What if an issue is genuinely complicated

        This one isn’t complicated, liberal. Anybody who demands inspecting the genitals of highschool girls because his daughter’s team lost an amateur soccer match (which is what this boils down to and what is already happening out there) is a pervert who needs to be hunted down with the full force of the law. Trans women in sports are not a competive issue anywhere. There is not a single sport were we are a relevant force, and in fact our presence is not an issue at all anywhere unless we’re talking absolute edge cases like medically untransitioned trans women in full contact martial arts, which do not even apply in this case because we are talking motherfucking school sports. You do not base political discourse on edge cases not even relevant to the topic in question when the reasoning they’re brought up in the first place is a full-fledged plan for our outright genocide. Wake up and smell the Zyklon B, liberal. This is what has been going on this year, a concerted, nationwide effort to eradicate us starting with gender affirming care for minors and sports bans that is backed by the entire Republikan party and a gigantic propaganda budget that has made my people public enemy number one for the most fanaticised part of the base of your country’s fascist party.

        TheUSA has already been consistently among the nations with the most transphobic murders worldwide for years. Florida and Texas are at the point where they are openly making lists of my siblings. If you still think this is complicated, you can walk into a buzzsaw for all i care.

  • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I remember reading that when Utah did their ban on trans athletes in school sports, there was exactly one trans girl playing in a girls’ sport in the whole state. Exactly one. Statewide legislature passing laws focused on one person, a child.

    All this scrutiny and transphobia is directed at literal children, many of whom might be the only trans athlete out of millions. Transphobia is such a disgusting thing to me, not only because of the chauvinism and bigotry, but because it’s just so senseless. Trans people are already rare enough as it is and also one of the most vulnerable populations in regards to poverty, assault, unemployment, etc. I’ve seen some statistics saying that only around 1,000 people in America initiate HRT per year. That should give an idea of just how rare and vulnerable trans people are. And now there’s a senseless cultural panic just to whip up a few more eyeballs on the spectacle?

    Death to America

  • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Kids can be up to a year older than their classmates due to the way kindergarten start date cutoffs work. These kids who arbitrarily end up older tend to outperform their peers, because a 7.9 year old is stronger and faster than a 7 year old. This is a real difference - the NHL did a study on this and found that their players disproportionately have early-year birthdays due to how this effect lines up with hockey camps.

    Do you care? Of course not, nobody cares about the competitive fairness of kids’ sports, the point is just to get them to exercise and have a hobby. We can verify that nobody takes this seriously by looking at high school sports, where suddenly a four year age gap is acceptable.

    Okay, so why does this suddenly matter when it’s what team a trans kid should be on?

  • Magician [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    This sports transphobia is mostly directed at trans girls/femme/women, right?

    Are they doing this shit to AFAB people in men’s sports?

    Regardless all this discourse is wrapped up in misogyny too, implying that people AFAB are always going to be worse at sports.

    And it doesn’t take into account the general unfairness in sports. Some people are born into wealthy families who can afford to feed their kids, get them healthcare, and train them into sports.

    It’s all the talking points about affirmative action, just in a different font.

    • milistanaccount09 [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      yes. You will notice though that the primary direction of transphobic rhetoric is aimed at trans women and not trans men. this is a result of misogyny at its core. this is part of the phenomenon of transmisogyny, the intersection of misogyny and transphobia

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It is also about patriarchy in that it is seen as a problem for a man to give up his patriarchal benefits, while it is seen as a virtue for women to seek patriarchal benefits. Same reason that gay men always suffered more gay hate than lesbians, the appearance of taking on the “feminine” role is viewed as a threat to patriarchy.

        • milistanaccount09 [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          And in a world where modern psychology was founded upon the teaching that all young girls suffer from penis envy, most people think striving for masculinity seems like a perfectly reasonable goal. Author and sex activist Patrick Califia, who is a trans man, addresses this in his 1997 book Sex Changes: The Politics of Transgenderism: “It seems the world is still more titillated by ‘a man who wants to become a woman’ than it is by ‘a woman who wants to become a man.’ The first is scandalous, the latter is taken for granted. This reflects the very different levels of privilege men and women have in our society. Of course women want to be men, the general attitude seems to be, and of course they can’t. And that’s that.”

          Once we recognize how media coverage of transsexuals is informed by the different values our society assigns to femaleness and maleness, it becomes obvious that virtually all attempts to sensationalize and deride trans women are built on a foundation of unspoken misogyny. Since most people cannot fathom why someone would give up male privilege and power in order to become a relatively disempowered female, they assume that trans women transition primarily as a way of obtaining the one type of power that women are perceived to have in our society: the ability to express femininity and to attract men.

          Whipping Girl, by Julia Serano

          • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Transphobia directed at transmascs is also always mysogynist in nature. Its core concepts are toxic notions of masculinity seen as unfullfillable for AFAB individuals, the maintainance of control over AFAB bodies as reproductive units and sexual objects, and the denial of agency to AFAB individuals, all due to their assigned “female” gender. Terfs routinely claim that trans men and transmasculine nonbinary people are just “confused girls” making a mistake, the entire terf discourse around the issue hinges on the concept not to let people designated as broodmares decide what to do with their uteruses because they are too emotional and irrational to make choices for themselves. It doesn’t get more mysogynist than that, which is ironic when the target of the mysogyny are men, but that’s bio-essentialism for you. When you want to see how fully seperated any and all terfs have become from the feminist roots at least some of them used to have, how deeply and utterly mysogynist they have become, ask them about trans dudes.

        • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          “Gay = Feminine” never made any sense to me. I’m gay as hell and I’ve never been anything close to feminine. It has literally zero basis outside of, I don’t know, cishet creep mentality?

          • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            In their minds it’s simply because anyone that wants to get with a man is obviously taking on the feminine role, and that both men are feminine because of it.

            And the other side of it is probably campness being the one thing straight people could use to clock gay people, and campness becoming associated (incorrectly) with all gay people because of its visibility.

            • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Guess that for the straights there are two orientations: straight and sexual/flamboyant.

              I’m basically like a stereotypical straight guy in every way except I happen to be gay (and without the creep attitude that seems incredibly common).

              That I don’t fit the stereotype has led to an “are you sure tho?” Groundhog Day. Like, motherfucker yes I’m sure, I don’t go around questioning your straightness and suggesting you try same sex relationships every other week. bordiga-despair

              Cishets need to be placed under clinical observation.

              • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Right and this is a problem for trans people in a unique way too. The trans people that pass can blend so well that cis people don’t think they even exist, and if they do they’re actually ok with those people because they don’t even register as “bad” to them, they can just pretend they don’t exist and in doing so they don’t threaten patriarchy at all because they’re non-existent.

                The only idea of a trans person that exists in the head of cis people is those that do not pass. The ones they can clock. The ones that do not fit in the social design and patriarchy that they want.

                • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  The intersection of transphobia and misogyny, but you’ll still get people who deny that intersectionality is a thing.

                  I am so exhausted with this heteronormative/cisnormative (I’m sure there’s another word for it but I can’t recall) society treating every LGBT person as some exotic animal, like there must be an explanation and you owe it to them for your deviation from the “norm”. Rabid queerphobes spewing their vitriol about the LGBTs controlling society when trans people are being murdered left and right. Disgusting, profoundly sick society.

      • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        “Period, end of story.”

        “That being said…”

        You support trans people. BUT… is not support of trans people. Its not complicated. The science is not complicated, its settled and theres no difference.

        If you support trans peole stop at “end of story.”

        Edit: i reread your post and its even worse than i thought at first glance. You’re just an outright bigot in denial.

      • Catradora_Stalinism [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.netBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The brain understands that they are not the same, and unfortunately never will be.

        There it is lol. thanks for nothing, bitch

        an ideal world is one where all the fascists and capitalists are laid out in a nice little line and mowed down with .50 cal’s

      • ScrewdriverFactoryFactoryProvider [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It is pretty complicated, yeah. Scientifically accurate human sex is not conducive to cleanly segregating people into two categories. Yeah, there are clusters, but I guess all systems are perfectly reasonable as long as you ignore all the ways that they don’t make sense or fail to do their job. Ending gender segregation is the only valid solution.

        But question of whether or not the Biden administration’s Department of Education should be using its powers to limit trans kids from playing school sports? That’s the only thing they have the power to do on this issue. And the answer is not complicated.

      • Gay_Tomato [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        There is no easy, fix all answer. It does not exist. You are left with a minority vs a majority. In an ideal world, yes, the answer would be easy and done with. We do not live in an ideal world.

        There an “easy fix.” There is an “easy answer” and you know exactly what that is the same way that ghoul does. The reason we don’t live in an “ideal world” is because people like you advocate for throwing minorities under the bus the moment our existence becomes even slightly inconvenient for you.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s not complicated whatsoever.

        A transwoman is a woman, regardless of where they are in transition. They don’t have to transition AT ALL for that to be true.

        They are a woman with a condition - being trans.

        A trans man is a man, regardless of where they are in transition. They don’t have to transition AT ALL for that to be true.

        They are a man with a condition - being trans.

        The only “complicated” thing in this is your bigoted mindset. You believe that these people are not what they say they are until they undergo and complete transition. You see them as their gender assigned at birth, which is incorrect, and you see them as “changing” their gender by undergoing invasive hormone treatment and surgery. This is a completely bigoted transphobic mindset and you need to rid yourself of these brainworms. brainworms

          • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The issue is that you think they need to transition in order to be fucking valid dipstick. By enforcing “you must transition first” you are actively taking the position that they’re not valid until they do.

            Fuck you. Stop talking to trans people. You are dangerous to them and their health.

      • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Unless you believe that people will change their genders expressly for an advantage in sports, the differences aren’t salient. And you shouldn’t believe that.

  • SexUnderSocialism [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Gotta love all the liberals coming in here telling us why it’s “complicated”, while pointing out they support trans right. No, you don’t support trans rights. Because if you did, you wouldn’t undermine those rights by parroting the same talking points as conservatives; talking points that are based on willfully ignoring facts, and even the lack of evidence that this is an issue that exists in the first place. It also gets tiring seeing those same people act like they know how trans people’s bodies work, and not even acknowledge the fact that trans people go through biological changes if they can get gender affirming care, and are very comparable to their cis counterparts. The medical science on it is right there, and trans people’s own experiences are living proof as well. But it’s easier forming bullshit “opinions” instead, especially if you have a certain agenda (conservatives), or just don’t care about said minority as much as you think you do.

  • zephyreks [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Who the fuck cares about school sports?

    There haven’t been many studies for the impacts at the highest levels of competition (Olympic, World Cup, etc.)… For professional sports I’m OK with taking a more conservative approach, but who the fuck cares about school sports? There’s so much genetic and age and socioeconomic variance that it literally doesn’t matter.