• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Antifascism? That’s literally fascism”

    A phrase spoken only by fascists

    For any potential commenters who don’t understand, fascism isn’t when politically motivated threats of physical violence, it’s when far-right-wing, ultra-nationalist, centralized autocracy, belief in and support of social hierarchies, strong regimentation of society and the economy, and politically motivated threats of physical violence

    Hey wait a second, one of the political parties in the US fits all those descriptions…

    • sic_1@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Boiled down, fascism is the belief that one group of humans is inherently better than another and as such should reign superior or wipe anyone out that resists. Could be motivated by racial, political or religious beliefs. In the US, it seems like all of those come together.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        From an outside perspective, it’s the difference between someone looking at you with distaste, and someone aggressively attempting to sink a 9" knife into your gut, repeatedly, while standing in a pile of cut up baby corpses. Just because both sides have issues, doesn’t mean the 2 are comparable.

        • halvar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If the scenario was what you detailed you would of course be right. But it seems more like:

          • Imperialism and pollution wrapped in the right-wing.
          • Imperialism and maybe just a little less pollution wrapped in the left-wing.

          I don’t care who fucks up their own country more. I care about who fucks me up more, which currently is basically the same for both sides.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re both the same except one of them wants the entire LGBT community dead and one of them wants more renewable energy

            But yeah totally both the same

            • JonEFive
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              But you don’t understand… They aren’t LGBT, so it doesn’t impact them and are clueless about how climate change affects them, so they don’t care.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You realize 90% of that is because we have a two party system where the evil shits get to delay and hold up the few actually good Democrats, right? Democrats aren’t good but they at least understand the job of representation. Republicans only want to rule. They don’t care what policies they push, they just want to be in charge and on top.

            If you cannot understand how vile, evil rulers are worse than ignorant fools who don’t try hard enough… Then you are quite literally dumber than a US Democrat.

      • PapaStevesy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which clearly displays the bias in your perspective, maybe you need a new angle.

        • halvar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look, I can wholeheartedly belive Party A does good for it’s country, while Party B does bad. But somehow both do on my expense.

          • PapaStevesy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, that’s how taxes work dipshit. Anyways, I thought you were foreign?

            • halvar@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m indeed not from the USA. I meant expense as in “loss for the sake of something gained”.

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes that party is the Democrats – Absolute morons, I mean just real dumb fuckers

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah the Democrats, with their, uhh, ultra-nationalism? Strict social hierarchies? Far right-wing ideology? Uhhhhhhh

      • JonEFive
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not saying you’re intentionally ignorant and I know this is a lot of words to read, but…

        For any potential commenters who don’t understand, fascism isn’t when politically motivated threats of physical violence, it’s when far-right-wing,

        Which party has more objectively conservative views?

        ultra-nationalist,

        Which party literally has a group called the Proud Boys? Which party tends to manipulate the American flag for all their causes i.e. Thin blue line? Which party thinks America is strictly for Americans and anyone outside our borders is somehow undesirable?

        centralized autocracy,

        Autocracy is a system of government in which absolute power is held by the ruler, known as an autocrat.

        Which party idolizes their leader, flies flags with his name on it, wears his slogan on their clothes? Which party seems to think that anything their leader says is the truth, anyone who disagrees is a liar (fake news, alternative facts)? Which party literally tried to force their leader into power despite losing the election.

        belief in and support of social hierarchies, strong regimentation of society and the economy,

        Which party keeps reducing and eliminating social benefits because if you’re of a lower economic status, you somehow deserve less? Suggesting that the minimum wage shouldn’t be increased? And conversely, which party seems to think that billionaires deserve to have that money because they’re somehow smarter or work harder?

        and politically motivated threats of physical violence

        Which party had a noose hanging outside the capitol on January 6th?

  • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Paradox of Tolerance

    Philosopher Karl Popper described the paradox of tolerance as the seemingly counterintuitive idea that “in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance.” Essentially, if a so-called tolerant society permits the existence of intolerant philosophies, it is no longer tolerant.

    TL;DR punch a nazi

  • DarkWasp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I too remember in the history books when all the countries banded together holding flowers politely asking the Nazis to stop invading and massacring them.

  • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fascism is when you commit violence against fascism. Which is bad because fascism isn’t violent. Wait a minute…

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The “Free Market of Ideas” is just “Heads I win, Tails you lose” by another name

  • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair, there was also this raping and marauding red army led by one of the biggest assholes of modern history west allied with.

    That said beating fash of any flavor is always self defense.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the worst things hitler did was make stalin look even vaguely sane or competent by comparison.

      • Bipta@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        As long as you’re not literally the worst you kind of get a pass in human culture.

        • yata@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s hyperbole. Stalin got a pass back then strictly out of necessity in the ongoing war against the Axis powers. However that didn’t mean people thought he was a good guy then, and neither does anyone but tankies nowadays either.

        • soviettaters@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except Stalin killed and oppressed more people than Hitler, he just hid it better and was on our side for a bit.

  • boatsnhos931@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Baseball really does bring people together but I’d bring a gun in case things go south young Padawan

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t buy it. There is a really big difference between a nation fighting an existential war with a military, and performative, mostly nonlethal, vigilante political violence. The latter is useful to fascists for obvious reasons; the experience of violence is at the core of their ideology, they have a clear path for using the trauma for hazing and indoctrination, it attracts attention, it attracts potential sympathy for the same reason it may serve the goals of nonviolent protestors to have violence seen being done to them in the course of their protest.

    Trying to engage with them this way seems like it would clearly advance their goals more than it would harm them. How could it do otherwise? Do people think activists respond to light beatings by becoming dissuaded from their activism? I feel like this kind of messaging is pushed either by fascists themselves or by people with goals aligned with fascists, like involving more people in violence and bringing the overall political climate closer to a civil war situation.

    • seahorse [Ohio]OPMA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, nothing is ever enough for fascists. You can be as peaceful with them as possible and they’ll still try to kill you. We had a democratic election in the US in 2020 and when the fascists lost they tried to do a violent coup. How much more peaceful can we be? It’s really unfortunate but I think the reality is that fascists only understand power and violence and ultimately you need to throw that all back at them as hard as you can and send them into hiding. The minorities the fash hate will be targeted by them and violence WILL happen against them even if you protest them as peacefully and legally as possible. Minorities deserve to live in peace and security without “paying the cost” of keeping things civil.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        fascists only understand power and violence

        Maybe, but the question is how do they understand it? You hit one of those people, how do they interpret and react to that? I don’t think it’s the way you would want them to. I think there is a threshhold for the level of violence at which terrorism actually works, and that threshhold is way past the point where things get really fucking dark. So you either go there, or you look for better options with fewer side effects, because in this case I think low level violence is clearly going to advance their cause rather than harm it. As for what those other options might be, I don’t exactly know, I’m not saying they have to be nice or polite or peaceful, just thought through a little better than advocating casual brawls.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What? When you’re punching someone for their shitty political views that beget violence, it’s both.

  • DaSaw
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    “No. Because then I would be the same as you.”