Taken from the CompTIA IT Fundamentals Exam Guide book (2nd edition, published 2021). I’m not sure if they fixed this in newer versions, if at all.

    • PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not disagreeing about it being a scam but the government uses Sec+ as an IAT level 2 requirement. Helps meet some contract requirements.

      • Ocelot@lemmies.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        have you… seen the state of IT and technology in general in the government? I mean actually that explains a lot.

        • PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m just saying that government contracts == money and so my point is that while Comptia may be (read: most definitely is) a scam/racket it can make a person eligible for a paycheck. Agreed that it doesn’t mean they’re competent.

    • Ocelot@lemmies.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      not entirely. It makes it easy to filter out the kind of applicants that would put that on their resume. Very useful for hiring managers. Saves lots of time.