• aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am an experienced cook and use one to produce consistent, on-target results. It more often prevents over-cooking, not under-cooking.

  • BanjoShepard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes. Especially for chicken breasts. It’s easy enough to know for sure they’re done, but they’re much easier to eat as soon as they hit 155F. My immune system has never questioned my chicken, but my taste buds are very thankful for the meat thermometer.

  • ornery_chemist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Yes, on the rare occasion I cook meat. Too unpracticed otherwise. I originally got one because I’m colorblind and was scared of undercooking red meat and tired of eating leather. As a bonus, I used it to get the temperature right when I got into fancier teas and inadvertently trained myself to judge the temperature of water pouring into my mug by the sound it makes within a couple °C, which is kinda neat. Now, if I could figure out how to do something similar so I stop overcooking food, that’d be grand…

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes! There wasn’t a lot of meat prepared in my house as I was growing up, so I didn’t get any experience with it. Having a meat thermometer means I don’t need to guess. It’s good.

    I’ve started cooking meat a lil cooler than recommended, in theory that it’s more tender. With a meat thermometer I know it’s still good.

  • MrGabr@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Only for chicken, for salmonella reasons, and steak, because I’m terrible at judging doneness without it.

  • Canopyflyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes, I have several of various types and use them extensively.

    They are not necessary to cook, they are necessary to cook consistently.

  • AntY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes, but never for meat. I use it when I make toffee, bake bread and some other things.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I am a proponent of meet thermometers, but I have to wonder if perhaps you might have considered not cooking things quite as long?

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yep, I am absolutely crap when it comes to judging the doneness of meat. I’ll often over or under cook without one.

    It also It makes things a lot less stressful when I cook. Rather than constantly going to the kitchen and checking if the roast (or whatever) is ready I just have a wireless thermometer I can look at while I play video games, read or something.