(and why conservatives hate public schools, ofc)

  • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 个月前

    It’s fine, just list it as “cellulose” on the ingredients list.

    (It’s not technically sawdust anymore after processing, but it’s still gross even though it’s food-safe.)

      • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 个月前

        I mean, it’s not free, but yes, edible sawdust would be good for the health of most people in the western world. Though they tend to get cellulose from cheaper sources like straw or chaff.

        • DragonTypeWyvern
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 个月前

          Well they sure aren’t eating vegetables so might as well shove some sawdust replacement down their throats.