Flying Squid@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoLauren Boebert Caught Vaping in Theater CCTV After Blaming Smoke on Fog Machinewww.mediaite.comexternal-linkmessage-square112fedilinkarrow-up1833arrow-down117file-text
arrow-up1816arrow-down1external-linkLauren Boebert Caught Vaping in Theater CCTV After Blaming Smoke on Fog Machinewww.mediaite.comFlying Squid@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square112fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down1·1 year agoHow is that classist? Looking at the top post, can only poor men wear pink thongs?
minus-squareGreatGrapeApe@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down14·1 year agoSuggesting that the people featured on that site support Boebert
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·1 year agoAre you saying that if you asked people in one of her district’s Walmarts you wouldn’t find anyone who voted for her?
minus-squareGreatGrapeApe@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down10·1 year agoIm saying that that site is classist as is suggesting that because someone is poor and has acted inappropriately that they necessarily back her.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·1 year agoBut if some of those pictures are taken in her district then some of those people voted for her, right?
minus-squaregregorum@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 year agoYou are literally the only one here suggesting that shopping at Walmart has anything to do with one’s class or being poor.
minus-squareGreatGrapeApe@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agoIm guessing you never visited that site
minus-squaregregorum@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 year agoGiven your track record, you should probably stop making guesses and assumptions. You’re just digging yourself deeper in that hole of yours.
minus-squareGreatGrapeApe@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agoIf you have why would you be arguing that the site is not classist?
minus-squaregregorum@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoI never made that argument. Again, you’re the only one here mentioning class judgments with regard to Walmart. I’m just pointing out that fact. 
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoAnswer my question, coward.
How is that classist?
Looking at the top post, can only poor men wear pink thongs?
Suggesting that the people featured on that site support Boebert
Are you saying that if you asked people in one of her district’s Walmarts you wouldn’t find anyone who voted for her?
Im saying that that site is classist as is suggesting that because someone is poor and has acted inappropriately that they necessarily back her.
But if some of those pictures are taken in her district then some of those people voted for her, right?
You are literally the only one here suggesting that shopping at Walmart has anything to do with one’s class or being poor.
Im guessing you never visited that site
Given your track record, you should probably stop making guesses and assumptions. You’re just digging yourself deeper in that hole of yours.
If you have why would you be arguing that the site is not classist?
I never made that argument. Again, you’re the only one here mentioning class judgments with regard to Walmart. I’m just pointing out that fact. 
Answer my question, coward.