Renfield (2023) was a box office corpseā$65M budget, $26M grossāyet itās a surprisingly fun splatter-comedy that deserved better.
Nicholas Hoult plays Renfield, Draculaās eternally abused familiar. For centuries, heās been the one covering up massacres, dragging corpses back to the lair, and nursing his master to health every time a vampire hunter gets lucky. The cycle never ends.
Now, heās sneaking off to therapy groups, wondering if self-actualization is possible when your boss is the Prince of Darkness. That opening sequence even splices Hoult and Cage into footage from Dracula (1931), erasing Dwight Frye and Bela Lugosi as if Universalās monsters had been quietly recast all along.
Of course, the main draw is Nicolas Cage. He isnāt just chewing scenery for the meme reelsāhe literally had his teeth shaved down so he could wear ultra-thin 3D-printed fangs and still enunciate through dialogue. Some prosthetic setups weighed twenty pounds, giving him a hulking, unnatural presence. His performance is theatrical, imperious, magnetic. The tragedy is that we donāt see nearly enough of him.
Hoult, though, is no slouch. His Renfield is a perfect blend of pained and pathetic, especially when he pops bugs for power. Those arenāt CGI snacks eitherāHoult actually ate potato bugs, crickets, and caramel cockroaches on set. Director Chris McKay even joined him for solidarity, while Cageāwho once swallowed live roaches in Vampireās Kissādeclined this time. The running gag works because Hoult sells both the disgust and the absurdity.
The side cast adds texture. Shohreh Aghdashloo commands the screen as a crime boss in New Orleans, and Ben Schwartz revels in playing her inept, whiny son. Awkwafina, unfortunately, is stranded in the role of a hard-boiled copāitās a part that never quite fits her comic timing or voice.
What really makes the movie tick are the fight scenes. McKay insisted on gallons of practical bloodāenough to paint half of Bourbon Streetāand it pays off. Limbs fly, torsos burst, and the choreography gleefully turns gore into slapstick weapons. Even behind the camera, chaos spilled into real life: during production, more than twenty crew cars were broken into, a touch of crime mirroring the crime family on screen.
Renfield wasnāt the launchpad Universal wanted for its āMonsterverse.ā Opening against Mario, John Wick 4, and The Popeās Exorcist sealed its fate. But what survives is a film that reframes Dracula as a toxic boss and Renfield as a burnt-out employee desperate for freedom.
For that alone, itās worth watching. And as long as Nicolas Cage keeps sinking his fangs into projects like this, Iāll keep showing up.
Where to watch:
Thereās a moment in the trailer where the support-group leader is casually inviting Dracula into the room, and Renfield panics as heās realizes whatās happening. As soon as I saw that, I knew I needed to see this movie. 10/10 did not disappoint.
Itās quite a fun movie. Cage as Dracula is priceless.
Yeah it was not super awesome or anything but you come away having been entertained.
The success of a movie being measured at the box office is so outdated. With the cost of going to the movies what it is, I wonāt go for 99% of movies, unless itās something to justify the big screen and sound. Renfield looked good but it was one of those āIāll wait till itās streamingā movies and not one I needed to rush to the theatre and spend $50 for
I think it was the marketing. I had never heard of it when it popped up buried in new releases on a streaming service. Based on this I assumed itād be shit but something in me was excited to see Cage as a vampire. Glad I did; 8/10 for me.
Hoult is a treasure
Idk how people saw Nic Cage as Dracula and didnt fall all over themselves grabbing tickets. That shit is golden.
My experience with this film was overwhelmingly positive but cut the other way.
What I saw was a deliberate and not-at-all veiled allegory for classic narcissistic abuse, its victims, and how victimhood can be self-perpetuating until you get help and break free. I would go as far as to say that itās both affirming, supportive, and informative to that end. Thereās even a not-so-subtle explanation as to why you donāt see group therapy for this sort of thing (itās on purpose and absolutely necessary).
Everything else is fun acting, action scenes, special effects, set dressing, homage to old horror films, you name it, itās in here. It all serves the storyās core premise brilliantly and keeps an otherwise dreadful topic - perhaps all too real for some of the audience - palatable for the filmās runtime.
It came and went so fast that I assumed it was terrible⦠until I caught it on streaming and had a blast watching it.
Itās no Citizen Kane, but itās a great way to spend a couple hours being entertained.
Movie was non stop hilarity. Nick was doing w/e that was. he felt so out of place but it worked. Benjamin Joseph Schwartz nailed his role and Hoult was perfect. Only problem was it was a bit too excessive with the gore. I thought it added to movie absurdity but others disagreed with me.
I liked it, but man the narration gets a little grating and just turns all the subtext into text
Iām a little surprised because itās a really good movie and Cage and Hoult fit perfectly in their roles.
lol I liked that movie.
I will watch absolutely anything with either Hoult or Cage in it. I thought Renfield was fantastic, and genuinely had no idea it performed that poorly sales-wise.
Truly hope it picks up cult status. Itās such a good movie.
I donāt really remember it being advertised much. And the few folks I know who saw it werenāt familiar with Nic Cageās less mainstream action flick work so they were really thrown by his character.
What I love about Cageās performance in this movie is that heās not just playing Dracula, heās playing Bela Lugosi playing Dracula.
It really serves nicely as a legacy sequel to the Universal horrors. Iād love to see a similar approach taken with Frankenstein.