Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 6 days ago'Never felt more betrayed': MAGA rebels over Trump's 'treasonous' Qatar base in Idahowww.rawstory.comexternal-linkmessage-square161linkfedilinkarrow-up1723arrow-down112cross-posted to: conservative@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1711arrow-down1external-link'Never felt more betrayed': MAGA rebels over Trump's 'treasonous' Qatar base in Idahowww.rawstory.comRedditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 6 days agomessage-square161linkfedilinkcross-posted to: conservative@sh.itjust.works
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·6 days agoAI are propaganda machines, check its sources before believing it
minus-squareNoxy@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·6 days agohow does one even know and verify what an LLM’s “sources” are? wouldn’t it just vomit out whatever response and then find “sources” that happen to match its stupid output after the fact?
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·6 days agoPrecisely my point. But if it is correct and can link to an authoritative source (eg. a news article), that is relatively easy to verify. How much you can trust a news article is still up for debate.
minus-squareNoxy@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days agoso then all the value it brings is the exact same thing search engines have already been doing for decades.
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·6 days agoIndeed, not very useful as a search tool IMO
minus-squareINHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·6 days agoAsk for the source and read it I suppose?
minus-squareNoxy@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoso then all the value it brings is the exact same thing search engines have already been doing for decades.
minus-squareBone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·6 days agoSure, but where are the sources saying it’s true what OP stated? It seems harder to prove a rumor.
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·6 days agoAgreed, I’m more worried about people blindly trusting AI than I am about this particular situation.
AI are propaganda machines, check its sources before believing it
how does one even know and verify what an LLM’s “sources” are? wouldn’t it just vomit out whatever response and then find “sources” that happen to match its stupid output after the fact?
Precisely my point. But if it is correct and can link to an authoritative source (eg. a news article), that is relatively easy to verify.
How much you can trust a news article is still up for debate.
so then all the value it brings is the exact same thing search engines have already been doing for decades.
Indeed, not very useful as a search tool IMO
Ask for the source and read it I suppose?
so then all the value it brings is the exact same thing search engines have already been doing for decades.
Sure, but where are the sources saying it’s true what OP stated? It seems harder to prove a rumor.
Agreed, I’m more worried about people blindly trusting AI than I am about this particular situation.