• SupremeFuzzler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why buy new, when you can just trade it in for a new model in a few millennia? You know a solar system loses 20% of its initial value just by driving it off the lot?

      • chaogomu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Technically, they lose about 20% of their generation capacity within a few hours of first exposing them to sunlight. It’s one of those weird quirks that researchers have been trying to solve for decades.

        Also, they tend to lose the rest of their generation capacity over decades, not millennia. The industry standard is for a panel to be able to produce 80% of installed capacity after 25 years.

        • jdnewmil@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Jesus. The initial transient used to be about 3%, but now is under 1% for most product being sold. It was never near 20%.

          But that doesn’t stop idiots from saying “we have optimizers” and installing them in the shade or facing north and acting surprised when they underperform.

              • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                At least until vacuum or dark energy is readily available. Gotta plan for the eventual heat death of the universe ya know.

            • MNByChoice
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              They also predict a 12% chance that the Solar System will be ejected from the new galaxy sometime during the collision. Such an event would have no adverse effect on the system and the chances of any sort of disturbance to the Sun or planets themselves may be remote.

              “We” may be able to explore the cosmos without leaving home.

        • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          A team at NREL found evidence for the cause of this a couple years ago. It’s something to do with interaction between the boron and the oxygen content within the silicon cells. If it holds up, hopefully we’re on the road lessening the degradation over time.

          • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Some panels are around 90% at 40 years now, and there isn’t really much of a price premium for those panels either.

        • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          that actually reminds me of a thing from a scifi book I listened to where they took some low acceleration but powerful planet moving tech and smashed two decently sized planets into the enemies sun from opposite sides, by the time they got the planets to the sun they where moving as close to the speed of light as they could get them so the effect was pretty brutal