• Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        66
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is gonna be like Capone: All these crimes and the thing that gets Trump behind bars is violating a gag order.

        Because you know he can’t abide by it.

        • spider@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because you know he can’t abide by it.

          If there’s any such thing as Incitement Tourette’s, he’s got it.

        • lando55@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Question since I’m genuinely lost when it comes to this - does forcing a gag order by these actions benefit Trump in any way? Does it ensure no one is able to speak about the case, or is it just limited to him?

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            IANAL - in both senses - but I don’t see how a gag order on other people would pass constitutional muster, especially with this Supreme Court.

          • sanguine_artichoke
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s limited to him. It would be in incredibly broad and against the 1st amendment to say other people couldn’t discuss it.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because that’s not technically illegal until the gag order, which went into effect after the post was made.

            • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              He wasn’t threatening. He was insulting. The word “attack” is misleading in this context.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                The threat wasn’t explicit, but it was certainly implicit. That’s why he posted her personal social media info. He is fully aware he has an army of followers that will take that and run with it. I don’t think that he should be able to get away with that so easily.

                • yeather@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Which is why he now has a gag order. The act of posting someone’s ig isn’t illegal, but now it is with the gag order.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If I had thousands of followers and I posted your social media info while insulting you, wouldn’t you consider that a threat? I don’t think a gag order, which was very narrow, is much of a punishment.

              • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                He was also inciting his followers.

                Whether or not it rises to the level of “inciting imminent lawless action” is a different topic, but it’s not like he was merely insulting someone to their face - he was pointing tens of millions of his psycho followers at her.

    • Gerudo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      For real! Putting it on social media WHILE IN COURT, should be the same as if he stood up and said it in front of the judge.