High interest rates may soon get higher. CNN reported that JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon sent a āstark warningā to Wall Street on Monday that it is possible the Federal Reserve will raise the benchmark rate all the way to 7% ā even though most analysts think it will top out under 6%. If his ācontrarianā prediction is correct, āyouāre going to see a lot of people struggling," Dimon said.
But the new era of high interest rates is already rippling through the economy and government.
The effects are being felt in the housing market: CNBC reported that mortgage demand fell 6% during the last week of September because āmortgage rates just continue to climb higher.ā Rate hikes are affecting car buyers: The average monthly payment on a new car is $736 ā up $33 from a year ago, per Axios. And theyāre being felt in Hollywood: Financial Times noted that entertainment companies are putting an end to the āgolden era of cheap streamingā because rates are making TV and movie production more expensive. Expect fewer new shows and higher streaming subscription costs.
Washington isnāt immune to the effects, either. The federal government was able to swallow rising deficits over the last 15 years, Eric Levitz argued in Intelligencer, because it could borrow money cheaply. Now the yield on a 10-year bond is at 4.8%, āits highest level since 2007.ā If the rate stays that high, āthe implications for the nationās finances will be profound.ā If federal borrowing continues and rates donāt come down, āinterest payment will come to consume more than half of federal tax revenue by 2050.ā
āHigher for longerā
āForget the shutdown,ā The Economist editorialized. Americaās āreal fiscal worryā is rising bond costs linked to the Federal Reserveās decision to keep interest rates āhigher for longerā as it tries to rein in inflation. Right now, the Feds spend 2.5% of the countryās gross domestic product servicing the national debt. By 2030, that number will be 3.2%, āequaling an all-time high and more than the cost of defense.ā And that might even be a low estimate. Itās clear that American politicians cannot ācontinue to act as if deficits do not matter.ā
āRising interest rates mean deficits finally matter,ā Greg Ip added at The Wall Street Journal. The now-dead era of ultra-low interest rates meant that āwe had a blissful 25 years of not having to worry about this problem,ā one analyst said. But itās tough to see who might solve that problem: Former President Donald Trump and President Biden āhave signed deficit-busting legislationā and nobody seems interested in either tax hikes or cutting Medicare and Social Security.
Donāt panic, Louise Sheiner wrote for The Brookings Institution. Yes, interest rates are high now ā a big reason the deficit has increased ā but āit is too soon to know whether the recent increases will persist, and if so, why.ā If rates do come back down, or if the GDP gets an unexpected boost, the crisis will be averted. For now āit is much too soon to tell.ā
āThe Romans had it worseā
Bank of America is taking the really long view on interest rates, Insider reported. The bank charted interest rates over 5,000 years of human civilization and found that while interest rates are relatively high now ā compared to recent history ā āthe Romans had it worse.ā The analysis was a bit tongue-in-cheek, however. āInvestors can probably take the chart with a grain of salt.ā
āSo is the low-interest era really over?ā asked The New York Timesā Paul Krugman. He doesnāt think so ā and points to Japan as the model. That country has had both low population growth and low interest rates for a long time, and America is entering its own low-population growth phase. āWhy shouldnāt we expect interest rates to go back to prepandemic levels once the Fed is done fighting inflation?ā
Maybe thereās no reason for the Fed to raise rates further. The data suggests āinflation is falling,ā Texas Tech University economist Alexander William Salter argued at The Hill, concluding that āfighting inflation is good, but causing needless economic pain isnāt.ā
Unless Iām missing something, that graph indicates the rate was consistently below 7% - often significantly - from ~1860-1970. How the heck do you define slightly?