• stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m more interested in the idea that a dead speaker got to choose all the people that would follow him.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s what mcHenry is saying he doesnt think is constitutional, and hes probally right.

      It does make sense to have a “transition” holder that can just call a vote for a newly chosen speaker. Having “Im the house speaker cause that guy died with no vote” as the default mechanism is garbage.

      For all the obstruction the GOP is playing at, the truth is they could have a speaker tomarrow. They give dems concessions, some simple compromise, and its over. The fact that they won’t is just them being dysfunctional and looking for any loophole not to do the basic governance they gave up 40 years ago.

      • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. Such a hard line that they won’t negotiate even the minimal needed things to make government function. This will continue until people change their mind on voting for obstructionists or gerrymandering is resolved. Hint: this will take a long time.