• gun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    It’s about class. The North American concepts of left and right are meaningless abstractions.

  • Yujiri@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Gotta have some axiological basis for “antiwork”. Though that isn’t to say we can’t cooperate with people who have a different basis, declaring oneself left doesn’t mean you can’t work with others who declare themselves right but share antiwork goals

    • sexy_peach@feddit.deOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I am totally for working with people of different believes, but only goal-oriented. Working with the right on unclear goals often is pointless because they don’t actually believe in them and just use it as a talking point.

  • stuckinconcrete@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Being fiscally conservative means limiting what rights workers get.

    Being socially conservative means limiting what workers get rights.

    Which part of that belongs in a labor movement?

    • poVoq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      No. It is either very naive or done in bad faith.

      You can be leftist / progressive without shutting the door to people that don’t fully agree with you, but pretending that work reform (or antiwork) can be something a-political & divorced from progressive ideals is going to set you up for failure.