• shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    No shit. We had plenty of guns when I was a kid (52 now), even AR-15s and the like, and this wasn’t a normal thing until after Columbine.

    I’d hold off on my manifesto, :), but mental health has taken a nosedive in this country. It’s far, far worse than kids can imagine. Fox News, Facebook, the internet, etc. has poisoned our collective brains and discourse.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m 38, and yeah it’s seriously fucked. I keep saying this and people still want to plug their ears and scream “it’s the guns!”.

      I’m a prime example, I have ADHD and hardcore insomnia, and I got laid off a few months ago, my health insurance just ended. In order to see a psychiatrist it’s gonna cost me $300 out of pocket for the visit, and then generic Ambien is like $120 for 60 pills. I got letters that say I could get health insurance via the COBRA Act of 1985, but it’s SEVEN HUNDRED AND THIRTY DOLLARS A MONTH. Healthcare.gov keeps playing commercials that say “enroll now and you can get health insurance for as low as $10/month!”. I went on there to look and it’s only available for 2024 right now and they want to know your income for 2024. I put in 80k and they said I wasn’t eligible, I put in 40k and it said it was gonna cost $350/month.

      My dad is 73 and he constantly has to fight with insurance and the pharmacy to get his Ambien as well.

      It’s absolutely ridiculous.

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah thanks for the info, but it will still probably be less to pay out of pocket. The shrink’s follow up is $200 and the Ambien will be $120. IDK how much I can get the premium down to, and even then there’s the deductibles.

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s what I’m thinking, but the question is “how much will you be making in 2024?” not “How much are you currently making?”

          • silverbax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can’t know the future, what if the economy craters? If and when your salary changes, you update it then.

            • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly, it’s a dumb question, no one really knows how much they’ll be making in the future, but it’s not like 2024 is far away.

      • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s brutal, and I’m very sorry to hear that. No one should have to struggle to find help, especially for stuff like that.

        I think this whole system is stupid, even from a business sense. If you want quality labour, “happy employees” are the way to go. If you prevent people from getting much wanted/needed help, you’ll have a lot less of those “happy employees”. You’ll also have fewer taxes being paid, less money being spent, fewer people attending events and buying non-essential things, etc. The current set-up makes no sense to me. Instead of imporving anything, let’s just keep continuing to make things worse and then complain that society is getting worse. That will totally fix things. It hasn’t worked for the past couple of decades, but it will totally magically change tomorrow. Assholes.

        I hope things get much better for you and your father soon. Y’all deserve MUCH better than this.

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks 😊 The problem is that they have no souls and conscience, and only care about money, so I don’t think anything will change this unless we go with public/socialized healthcare but that will never happen because “socialism” is “the worst thing that could happen” according to some people… my dad is against it because he “doesn’t want to help pay for some low-life’s healthcare which he has worked his ass off to pay into” 🤦‍♂️

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        almost 10% of your income!? fuck the “hyper socialist” Germany has 6% from my taxes

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They took about 30% of my yearly income for local (I lived and worked in NYC for 7 years), state, and federal taxes for the past few years! I may get about 5% or less of that back in my tax return.

          Best country in the world! 🤑

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it puts your mind at ease at all, crime (violent and otherwise) had been on a decline from 1993 until 2016 and while it has risen since 2016, it still hasn’t hit pre-'93 levels last I saw. Furthermore despite what you’d expect, those AR-15s are responsible for less than 500 (all rifles) of our 60,000 gun deaths, which is 0.833333333333% of our gun deaths. In fact, mass shootings account for less than 0.2% of our gun deaths per year. So, I mean “any is too much” yes, but it isn’t near as bad as it seems. source

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think what terrifies people about mass shootings is that they’re random. They just target random people (or God forbid fucking children).

        I mean violence is obviously bad but most of the time it’s contained in certain areas of town, and so long as you’re not mixed up with the wrong people it’s probably not a major concern for most people.

        So when they see people get shot up at the mall or at a concert or at school they think “shit that could be me or my kids”

        But yeah you’re 100% right and they are blown completely out of proportion.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah and I get that for sure, that’s part of what makes Aneurysms so scary too, can randomly happen at any moment. Tbh I’ve realized best thing I can do is just try to keep myself and those around me safe as best I can and carry one of my own, it’s the only thing that is actually within my power, unlike “fix the entire country” lol.

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      this wasn’t a normal thing until after Columbine.

      Things that are relatively new, circa Columbine

      • the 24-hour news cycle

      • rage-farming as a genre of syndicated media (think: Limbaugh, Hannity, InfoWars)

      • selling fear becomes huge moneymaker for opinion programmers (Limbaugh, Hannity, Carlson, etc)

      • politics as a staple on social media comment threads

      • offshore groups (like troll farms, etc) posing as domestic political actors, targeting particular demographics

      Ready access to guns is of course a problem, but it’s probably made worse when all those folks with ready access to guns are bathed in fear and loathing 24/7 by millionaires making lots of money telling them things to make them or their families afraid or angry. Just a thought

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The vast majority of mentally ill people are not violent. The idea that mental illness is largely responsible for the prevalence of mass shooters contributes to the stigma already attached to mental illness.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Know what did happen shortly before Columbine? Reagan dissembled our mental health infrastructure.

        I was a teen in the late 80’s. Hell, I thought homelessness was a normal thing I simply hadn’t heard of until MTv started flogging it.

        And if the mass shooting didn’t start post-Columbine…? LOL, we didn’t have that word in our lexicon.

        FFS, we used to able to buy shotguns in the auto parts store. But suddenly, guns and “easy access” are the problem?

        Why don’t you folks start a fight you have a chance of actually winning? Shut down the right-wing propaganda, hard, yesterday.

        And while we’re at it, I’d kill for a solid study on how many killers, including suicides, are left/right politically. We both know how that’s gonna play out.

        • xkforce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am saying that something else started it. Mental health care has been terrible for way longer than Columbine. And youre going to have to explain why there was a decade and a half gap between Reagan and this mass shooting. Dont get me wrong, Reagan was a real piece of shit but I don’t think mental health or the lack of it is the major cause. Easy access to guns OTOH…

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mass shootings pre columbine were more rare but weren’t unheard of. Mostly they were belltower or highway sniper style incidents or postal related as they were severely overworked at the time.

          Also, while mass shootings were more rare, not only could you get one at the hardware store you could order a full auto directly to your door with no background check or even ID for a while.

          Just to add.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Up until 2000, the NRA was actually a big supporter of gun control. At that point they switched to being pretty much zero tolerance for any gun control, and even trying to dismantle gun control.

          One could apply the same logic you just did to blame mental health regulations to blame this instead.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one is saying all mentally ill people are violent. They’re saying most of these mass shooters are mentally ill. What stigma? That mentally ill people should have help available to them?

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It always weirds me out that the first school shooting I remember occurred a few bit over a year before Columbine. Heath High School, December 1997.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My high school school had a 1970s state championship banner for rifle shooting up in the gymnasium. It might even still be there.

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The media circus around columbine has certainly contributed to mass shootings. Every loser knows how to be remembered now.