• SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You should probably click the link and read the tshirt before commenting. It actually about policy issues not his genitals.

    • BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I previously added the quote “Now you can buy it in Medium, Large, Extra-Large, or in the size of Trump’s manhood, Small.” to the link. I removed it because I also think it’s kind of stupid.

      I can imagine that everything they state is well thought through, there is going to be an important Supreme Court decision. Maybe they try to include this kind of insult in the case.

      • hogunner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not trying to start an argument but I don’t see anywhere in the OP’s article where it specifically mentions Trump’s genitals. The closest I can find is:

        “Despite outward appearances, this case is really not about Trump or the size of his policies or [body parts],” said Ms. Sunderji.

        Did I miss it?