• smitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    178
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    There should be a religious test for politicians.

    If you’re too religious, you should not be a politician

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      62
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a Canadian politician I refuse to vote for because he’s seihk, wears the turban and religious regalia. Of course you get called racist, but I wouldn’t vote for a Jewish person in Orthodox garb, or a Christian carrying a Bible everywhere. It tells me that you put your religion above everything, even your constituents.

      Of course there’s an India/seihk scandal going on right now. Having a super religious seihk in power would have made that one a way bigger shit show.

      • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Perhaps start by learning how to spell Sikh before passing judgment on them.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand what people think of when they read…

        If you’re too religious, you should not be a politician

        but it’s literally part of what you’re saying. Why the downvotes, because they’re naming specifics of what signals to them being too religious? Make it make sense, Lemmy.

        • Instigate@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s because adherence to religious dress codes is not a clear indicator of fundamentalism or evangelism. Women who choose to wear burkas, niqabs headscarves etc are not immediately downtrodden and subservient women who agree with religious sexism. A Sikh man choosing to wear a turban and not shave his body hair is not a clear indicator that he’s a fundamentalist in any way.

          Judge politicians by their words and actions, not by how they look. There are many religious zealots who wear simple suits and dresses.

          • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            You took the ACTION of putting on garb that says your religion is above everything else. I will judge you for that on the political field

            • CumBroth@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You took the ACTION of putting on garb that says your religion is above everything else

              Incorrect assumption. A dominant religion in any given society will influence cultural and societal norms. Sometimes, perhaps even more often than not, the reason for wearing religious clothing is social conformity. That doesn’t necessarily mean that the wearer is a fundamentalist or even religious at all. There are even atheists who wear religious clothing just because the community they belong to excepts them to do so and they don’t want to stand out (applies to all genders). And that’s just one of several possible reasons other than the one you assumed to be the only possible explanation.

              • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                At the end of the day my argument is that I want politicians of any stripe or religion to leave their religion at the door. Anyone who puts their god’s will into their decision making process (which all religious people do) has no business in politics

                • CumBroth@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s reasonable and I agree with that. I’m just pointing out that religious clothing doesn’t necessarily mean that that person will do what you fear. As Instigate points out, their words and actions are what matters and what we should be paying attention to.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      74
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is the opposite of what this country was built on; freedom of religion.

      Being religious should not disqualify anyone, but if you push past separation of church and state then and only then should you be disqualified

      • Fal@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        Being too religious should absolutely disqualify you, just like believing the world is flat or any number of other complete nonsense should disqualify you.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        So… you’re saying ….

        If they’re too religious… they should be disqualified…

        The line for you being that they try to force their beliefs on others. Which, personally, I view as a given when their campaign platform includes “Christian Values” (or any other religion’s values,)

        If you can’t make a secular argument…. It doesn’t belong in government.

      • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Puritans came here to seperate THEIR church from the state, after that it became them imposing their religion on natives.

        The actual country’s founding in 1776 was. Far from religious, and many of the founding fathers were not religious or outright anti religion

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bring religious should be a disqualification. You have a higher master you serve. You can’t be trusted to put the country and the citizens first.

      • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Religious beliefs are not disqualifying, but if that’s your whole way of being, you should not hold public office. Render unto Caesar.