In this video I discuss how generative AI technology has grown far past the governments ability to effectively control it and how the current legislative measures could lead to innocent people being jailed.

  • Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Prove it’s fake when some of it of your daughter is making it’s way around school.

    You’ve missed the point. Fake or not it does damage to people. And eventually it won’t be possible to determine if it’s real or not.

    • hydration9806@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      When that becomes widespread, photos will be generateable for literally everyone, not just minors but every person with photos online. It will be a societal shift; images will be assumed to be AI generated, making any guilt or shame about a nude photo existing obselete.

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        What a disguising assumption. And the best argument against AI I’ve ever heard.

        • hydration9806@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, anyone with enough artistic talent can draw whatever they would like right now. With AI image generation, it essentially just gives everyone the ability to draw whatever they want. You can try to fight the tech all you want, but it’s a losing battle.

    • Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      AI generated porn depicting real people seems like a different and much bigger issue

      AI generated CSAM in general, while disgusting, at least doesn’t directly harm people, fabricated nudes most definitely does, regardless of the age of the victim

        • Ignotum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          AI generated nudes of noone in particular isn’t hurting anyone, not directly at least, but AI generated nudes of a specific person, using that persons likeness and everything, that’s much worse

          AI can generate faces of people that don’t actually exist, that’s what i mean

          The post made it seem like it was about AI generated CSAM in general, which while disgusting, doesn’t directly harm anyone, but then the comments spoke about AI generated CSAM depicting a real individual, and that’s much worse, but also not a problem that’s specific to children

            • Ignotum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Currently pedos tend to group up and share real csam, and these “communities” probably serves to normalize the activities for the members, perhaps being able to generate it will keep pedos from clumping together, reducing the degree of normalization so they’re more likely to seek help, and as a bonus, real children aren’t preyed upon to create said csam?

              And saying that removing ai tools that can generate csam will lead to them “attempt to fuck children in the streets” as you say, would you also say that we should stop criminalizing the distributing existing csam, because the existing csam that is shared in paedophile circles is all that is keeping them from going out and raping children?

          • Neato@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            AI CSAM is incredibly harmful. All CSAM is harmful. It’s been shown to increase chance of pedophilic abuse.

            Stop defending CSAM, HOLY SHIT.

            • Helix 🧬@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s been shown to increase chance of pedophilic abuse.

              Can you link me a source for that, please?

            • Ignotum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Jeez, calm down

              I am not defending CSAM, just saying that CSAM depicting an actual existing child is magnitudes worse, as is any other kind of fabricated sexual content of real people.

              Take loli porn for example, it’s probably bad for society, but if someone makes loli porn based on the appearance of an actual individual, that’s much more fucked up, and in addition to the “normal” detrimental effects, that would also harm that victim in a much more direct way.