• RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol you’re the one contributing to making it worse. Google already loses money on operating YouTube and freeloaders only exacerbate that loss. They’re going to make ads longer, unskippable, and take away your perception of a choice. They’re going to kill every other option you have. Pay or stop watching.

    • sour@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      it was worse before i started blocking ads

      look what you made me do

      pay or stop watching

      no

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pay or stop watching isn’t the choice I’m putting in front of you.

        It’s the one YouTube is winding up to put in front of you. Good luck.

        • sour@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          you made it look like that

          youtube is winding up to put in front of you

          will they send police if i keep blocking ads

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Normally I’d agree with you, but this is Google, the 4th largest companies in the world, not some scrappy startup which might go away next quarter if they can’t hit their revenue target. If Google actually shutdown YouTube, I’d cheer because that’s when the real competition begun in the video space.

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, so only scrappy startups deserve to run a profitable business and Google should be forced to choke down the abhorrent cost of YouTube out of… what exactly? If they were making money hand over fist on it, sure, fuck em. But they’re not. YouTube isn’t profitable and the reason there aren’t competitors is for that exact reason. They are literally free video data storage with no limit. No site can compete with that. Everything else would make you pay for a membership or have a small hard limit or even have some kind of gate yet you take it as the standard.

        If YouTube fails there will be no alternative to take their place. Amazon might try, but their greed might stop them. They’re already a household name, what would the point be?

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing is, I’m ok if Google do this right from the start. Instead, they use their massive capitals to run YouTube for free and squashed all their competitors. Vimeo was the most promising competitor in this space, but they can’t compete with Google’s infinite subsidy to YouTube and had to pivot. Now that there is no competitor around anymore, Google jacked up prices, reduced monetization rates for their content creators, locked up formerly free features behind subscription plans, and now declaring a war with adblockers.

          If YouTube fails there will be no alternative to take their place.

          So yeah, I’m not supporting Google in this space because this whole situation where there is no competitors to YouTube anymore is Google’s own doing.