he said. “We’ll be gone, and it’ll be gone because of an advertiser boycott.”… eeer, no.

  • archomrade [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m a little confused by this comment, Twitter isn’t a publicly traded stock anymore?

    Unless you mean he made deals with them before he BOUGHT twitter (for well beyond market value), meaning the hedgies would be taking a loss…?f

    edit: that doesn’t preclude the possibility he’s tanking the company so he can declare bankruptcy to get out of his loans, but that doesn’t involve conspiring with hedge funds, it’s just a different kind of financial fraud

    • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your edit has been my pet theory for some time. That and he gets to ruin a platform that leftists have used to organize around the world.

      • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That just tells me that he doesnt understand how leftists work. We change platforms on the reg.

      • archomrade [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea, I mean I think it’s probably his best play. But I don’t really grant him to be so principled as to have originally bought twitter for that purpose: I think he’s a dumbass who got called on a shitpost, and now he has to weasel his way out.

        Doesn’t mean he’s not also a reactionary cunt, but I personally think that plays second fiddle to this situation.