• Delta_V
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bikers really need their own infrastructure that’s kept entirely apart from where cars are. Bikes and cars sharing the same road is terrifyingly unsafe for both.

    • skyfaller@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      “unsafe for both”? What is the bike going to do to the car? Scratch the paint? Get blood on the tires?

      That said, I agree that separated bike infrastructure saves lives and encourages biking by making people feel safer.

      • Dabundis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        64
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Easy enough to imagine a driver (understandably) swerving to avoid killing a cyclist and losing control of the car

        • ilikecoffee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not to mention the psychological effects if an accident does happen… ‘Unsafe’ doesn’t have to only mean physical injury or death…

          • Dabundis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree. As long as there are drivers, there will be shitty drivers, so it’s worthwhile to design roads in a way that minimizes the chance that shitty driving will kill people.

      • FMT99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a little melodramatic. I’m 100% on the cyclist side (don’t even have a driving licence) but even I can see mixed traffic is dangerous for both.

        What driver hits a bike unexpectedly (assuming no intent) and doesn’t react in a potentially dangerous way? People crash cars trying to avoid deer even.

        • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          As someone who biked everywhere, daily, for years, I would have loved so much to have my own dedicated infrastructure, if only our own separate, Barrier-protected lane in the street.

          I’ve been to cities where they have added in lanes separate from the road, going all over town, and they’re usually packed with people using them.

          People want this kind of thing.

          • JacobCoffinWrites@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            In some ways, it really feels like city streets were made for people from outside the city driving in for a specific purpose, and public transit, sidewalks, and bike paths are for the people who actually live there.

            The whole previous phase of ever-widening streets/highways and paving any open ground for parking almost feels like an attempt to make the cities more like a theme park you drive to and leave at the end of the day. I’m glad things seem to be trending the other way now, with more emphasis on infrastructure I can use living here.

      • thechadwick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean I get your point, but still agree with op. Running somebody over is unsafe and nothing terrifies me more than backing up in parking lots where kids might dart out unexpectedly.

        There’s bad drivers everywhere, but I’d hazard a guess that most of them do not want to kill a cyclist either…

      • mreiner@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, if a car doesn’t see a cyclist until the last moment, swerves to avoid it, and hits something else, the cyclist being there created a dangerous situation for the driver.

        Even just considering a driver hitting a cyclist, the driver still has to live with that outcome for the rest of their life. Unless your expectation is that the driver is a psychopath who only cares about the condition of their vehicle, which I suppose is a possibility.

        • Grass@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          My bike is a fat bike with diy motor kit. It’s really damn heavy. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s on par with a light deer now. I wouldn’t want to hit it at all but definitely not with anything smaller than an f150.

    • ShadowRam@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed.

      If a city wants to reduce cars on the road, buses/trains/subways yeah that helps a little bit.

      But make a dedicated network where it’s only pedestrians, bikes and electric vehicles under a certain speed limit. Especially if it’s covered in some way,

      There a TON of people that would absolutely prefer that over cars

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if they’re separate, general-purpose lanes and bike paths and sidewalks have to cross sometimes. The biggest problem with the infrastructure pictured isn’t the bike lane itself, it’s the inadequate intersection treatment.

      In particular, the car slip lane should’ve been removed and a stop bar before the bike lane crossing should’ve been added.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, the bike lane should be raised above all of it so that bikes don’t have to stop at all.

        Great bike infrastructure is when bike riders don’t have to stop for car traffic. It should ALWAYS be the other way around, or the paths shouldn’t cross at all.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why should cyclists be the ones who have to go up the slopes? If you’re going to do that, raise (or better yet, bury underground) the car lanes instead.

          • Haywire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I think they are saying the surface should be raised so the bike lane is level and the street passes over a speed table. This makes it evident that the street is crossing the bike lane, rather than the bike lane crossing the street. We are talking inches, not tens of feet.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s inconsistent with the “so that bikes don’t have to stop at all” part, but it would be much more reasonable than the nonsensical idea I was mocking.

    • zib@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hate riding my bike in the street for exactly this reason. I really shouldn’t be of the mindset that every time I get on my bike could be my last.

    • Haywire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Woodlands Development north of Houston did this very well in the first phase of development. Bike paths wound through the woods on the backside of property while streets wound through the front. This gave more street facing property while bike travel was typically shorter distances. It was really amazing. It was abandoned for more square property lines and conventional development in later phases.

    • illumrial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Defensive scowling has helped save my life against gigantic SUVs on more than one occasion. Did you know that road monsters cannot legally pulp you without your consent?

  • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Goddamn it even looks like one of those speed boosters in video games. Probably Happy Wheels if I had to guess.

  • cobson@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    fold thought story keep you hearing ready among fertile liquid friend month sticky side property cake news bottle disease school operation instrument grain brown colour toe rain swim new rough do delicate because care existence new ticket kiss toe west behaviour society will dead insurance frame poison safe good late

  • cobson@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    start toe gun high profit necessary amount hammer coat wave cake business story silk hospital wax direction true bulb horse thought arch worm brake nerve minute year brown short kind horn power rough loose kick writing public change board government answer silk bottle destruction cloud tall together discussion advertisement quick

  • cobson@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    pain sock star competition floor fixed amusement manager cord boot brain ear swim summer probable payment receipt second general up boiling apparatus expert fear slow mixed shirt healthy art lip harbour sock desire danger complex turn observation stone iron other shirt thing event tall event addition effect blow though ear

  • cobson@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    soap mountain need word structure loose expert range please and political among copper dust jump ball bad thing money branch frequent circle chance structure rhythm tongue play walk skirt school neck boot animal expansion fight effect present teaching porter of put drink square payment electric collar range committee rice dirty

  • cobson@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    roll amusement tax weather road feather power same conscious side yellow shirt distribution knife fear where smell loud discussion train lock kiss station fertile tooth opposite control physical special clock please short decision drop reason library on force behaviour give receipt limit through bucket loose bath young money equal public

  • cobson@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    finger art same form act move apparatus representative weight against may then crack ever comparison example judge plate dust talk hate behaviour year rough false sticky true great bitter opinion smooth secret steel part offer wide awake narrow glass sharp grip lead whip wrong wound present wind disease grip flag

  • cobson@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    division regular hook heat organization nation size fire growth theory come produce tight cry name strong mixed colour spade possible yellow glass hat blade advertisement small store ready force regular hour paper garden after broken sound money wall push fixed bone tail letter fall boot cotton acid hat salt jump