• OhmsLawn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t say if they’ll exempt luxury brands. I’d be willing to bet they do.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article says it’s aimed at fast fashion, so luxury brands are almost certainly exempt.

      • geissi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        aimed at fast fashion, so luxury brands are almost certainly exempt

        That would depend on the specific wording but if they define minimum standards and the ‘luxury brands’ already fulfill those then I don’t see the problem.

        How else would they exempt them? Even the most corrupt lawmakers don’t just write brand names into their legislation.

        • theolodis@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Luxury brands usually produce in the same places as fast fashion, the only difference is their margin when selling. If you want it sustainable and with fair working conditions, it’s also cost about the same, but you’d have to look for it (and probably will only find a few products of luxury brands)

          • ebikefolder@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s why I have my own definition if “luxury”: Sustainable materials, humane working conditions, timeless style, long lasting construction etc.

            I have to look for it, especially since I buy second hand, but not very often because of, well, whatever I buy is timeless and long lasting. No need for frequent replacement.