Giuliani was a no-show at a federal court hearing in the duo’s defamation lawsuit, prompting a lashing for his attorney by U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, who had ordered Giuliani to be present.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    He was ordered to be in court by the judge. Why isn’t there a warrant out for his arrest? [That was rhetorical, we know why.]

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Probably because this is a civil case and not a criminal one. Not showing up negatively affects his case more than anything. This isn’t the same as defying a subpoena, or not being present as a criminal defendant, both of which would absolutely land this broke-ass motherfucker in jail

      • drislands@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I’m not mistaken, refusing to defend yourself in a civil case results in the judge automatically assuming everything the plaintiff is accusing you of is true. I wonder if that applies when your lawyers are present but you aren’t when ordered?

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’ve already decided against him, the trial next week is for damages.

          Just like the Trump company trial in New York right now and the E. Jean Carrol defamation trial firing up in January.

          “We’ve already determined you’re liable, now it’s all about damages…”

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not a criminal trial. Civil trial. They already found him liable and he’s out of money, it’s all performative at this point.