• Decoy321@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s still disingenuous to call it unskilled, though. Even those jobs require rudimentary skills that not everyone has. If we diminish the value of these skills, we’re just devaluing people even further.

    • Argonne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What do you want to call it? Just curious, we love to criticize but not offer suggestions

      • force@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why try to draw an arbitrary division like that in the first place? There are a lot of “skilled labor” positions that don’t actually require any certification or training. And there are a lot of “unskilled labor” positions that do require training. It kind of just seems like a way to dismiss certain types of labor as “lower” than others, at least that’s how the term is used in a majority of contexts.

      • maniclucky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got into an argument with someone about this. I ended up proposing generalized versus specialized.