For me it’s traefik. It’s took me a while to get it working, but it’s actually really easy now. Setting up container access with labels is very convenient!
Traefik, because I can configure it with labels on my containers and don’t have to deal with the proxy config every time I add a new service.
Used nginx for years but it’s starting to show the signs of its age, same as Apache did a few years before that.
For me it’s https://nginxproxymanager.com/ it’s just so easy to setup and use. One docker command and you’re up and running with a nice webinterface to manage access to your docker instances with ssl. I heard good things about Traefik too but I have no personal experience with that one. NPM does everything I need and if it ain’t broken… :)
I second NPM. As you mentioned it’s been very easy to use, but I also haven’t been trying to do anything complicated.
I’ve never used load balancing so perhaps Caddy or Traefik is easier to use than NPM in that regard, but I wouldn’t know.
Yes NPM is for basic reverse proxying, so one URL to one server. If you wanted to scale and load balance across multiple servers you’d need regular nginx with a text config file since you literally can’t configure a second or third server.
And I’d still find that easier than Traefik, but maybe that’s just because I’ve been using Apache2 and nginx for like a decade at this point so it’s what I know.
I used Traefik on my Docker stack and it’s pretty neat, though it took some time for me to get my head around how to configure it correctly.
Yeah seems like I was lucky to find what I needed on the first try. A colleague of mine was using Traefik but switched to NPM because it’s so easy to use.
I’ve been using NPM for years… but since 2.10.3 broke SSL certificates and there’s been literally no interest from JC21 to fix the problem (there’s a PR ready to go) i’ve been forced to look elsewhere and have settled on caddy for now…
To be fair, the pull request was last week. It’s inconvenient but life/work balance.
Agreed but it’s more the worry that it’s been broken for over 3 weeks and the dev(s) seems to have no interest in resolving it… to me that is a bad sign of things to come and projects being abandoned.
If i’m incorrect and the devs have been vocal about the issue then please correct me and point me to where i should be looking.
I’m not challenging you, so please don’t take of fence here but is the issue sincerely a ‘lack of interest’ or is it just that NPM is FOSS and the maintainer is bogged down with life? You could fork it and fix it.
It’s a very good question and of course… i could fork it and fix it using the PR… but then that would be it… I’m not experienced enough to even achieve that to be honest…
My issue I guess is not so much with the fact that there is a problem… it’s with the fact that i can’t afford for my homelab to be down because it’s never fixed or takes time to fix… i appreciate all of this is free… i think i may of even donated at some point because i was so thankful it existed… but now it’s such an integral part of my and my families life that i cannot have something in my stack that isn’t going to be fixed rapidly.
JC21 created an amazing product and if it’s fixed or V3 ever appears i’ll 100% check it out… but for now whilst it’s not as pretty… i have to fall back to caddy.
I second that. Amazing easy to use, configure, supports (LetsEncrypt) certificates via DNS-01 challenge and integrates with ease with most DNS providers.
Paired with authentication providers (keycloak, authelia, authentik), the “advanced” textbox lets you do forward proxying really easy, or customize your “basic proxy”.
I’m not sure how many of these features are present in Traefik, it would be really nice if any of you know if any of these are easily supported in it:
- Forward proxying
- Custom rewrites (nginx
internal;rewrites) - Unattended DNS-01 support with ACME (LetsEncrypt)
I used NPM for a very long time, but after I switched to podman, DNS name resolution for containers stopped working in NPM, they work fine in every other container. Switched to caddy and it’s okay, it only supports HTTP transports so I can’t use it as a gateway for my DoH/DoT server, but that’s not a huge deal. Once NPM works properly on podman I may switch back
deleted by creator
I’ve been a long proponent of nginx but I am currently in the process of migrating to Caddy because of the better presets.
OT: I love that Siri profile picture; it didn’t occur to me that you could use an animated one!
Ha ha, thanks :D I only recently learned that too. The images are delivered in webp format, which supports animation.
Nginx, because it works well and most open-source projects provide good examples for it when setting up things.
Same for me. You need the read into the documentation a bit, but once you understand how it works its fairly easy.
nginx. Traefik is near unusable if you ever need something that isn’t dockerized. Caddy seems neat, but I miss some options you get with nginx.
nginx is just… good in all aspects.
Apache. My server is kinda stuck in 2018.
Every time something has an update I need to remember how I installed it to start with, a script? From source? By some other random method? I’ve got gitea waiting to update but I really can’t remember how I installed it to start with 🤣🤣
So yeh, Apache, because it first works with my tangled mess
In the past I’ve used SWAG and NPM and then later traefik when I was using Docker, but now that I’ve switched to Kubernetes I only use Traefik which oddly is an altogether different beast than Traefik for Docker which I find odd. On K8S traefik is pretty straightforward to use while on Docker it’s a bit of a mess so much so that I made a github repo about how to set it up
- This somehow got posted even though I had only clicked Preview, don’t know how that happened -
so that others in the future could figure out how to get Traefik working in docker because the documentation was kinda terrible.
I also tried Caddy (2 I think) but couldn’t get it to work because the documentation was awful and in order to use DNS based authentication for LE certs you have to make your own docker container which is nuts; and there’s no documentation for that either (at least none that I could find)
caddy for not having to think about TLS
Went from Nginx (and I pushed it hard on others to use) to NPM to Traefik to Caddy. Caddy is just simple, easy setup for Certs, and integrates easily with Authelia.
I’ve switched from NginxProxyManager to Caddy as i don’t like the fact that 2.10.3 has just broken the certificate side of things…
The thing i really miss is having a GUI to handle things but having cockpit on the same system makes a (poor) suitable replacement.
Caddy, the configs are usually pretty simple to get you started (specially the for free https in the standard setup).
Caddy, slapping essentially 2 lines into a config file and my reverse proxy is ready for my local network and websites? Can’t really beat that
When it comes to some services though like my openwrt router, I do use Nginx since it’s far more likely to be available in some places
Caddy for general reverse proxy stuff, works like magic and makes certs, routing, etc just work.
I also have a lot of my stuff subsequently reverse proxied behind Authentik for anything that shouldn’t be exposed to the public internet
I love that about Caddy as well, it just works!
Do you know of any tool that can help me look at overall traffic that goes through it?
Right now I am using Mullvad through gluetun to essentially route traffic to my services without opening ports on my router and I am just curious what sort of traffic is hitting my server seeing how (I hope) isolated my address seems to be (servicename.mydomain.tld:<random port recieved from mullvad port forwarding>)
I will soon migrate this reverse proxy setup to a VPS since Mullvad will be sunsetting their port forwarding feature soon but I am still in need of a tool that can show me what sort of traffic goes through Caddy. Something like countries, IPs and services that they are trying to access as well as the request types.
Do you know of any tool that can help me look at overall traffic that goes through it?
I haven’t looked in detail at the Monitoring Caddy documentation page and haven’t used this myself, but apparently it can be configured to emit a bunch of metrics in Prometheus format.
Something like countries, IPs and services that they are trying to access as well as the request types.
Oh, for that kind of thing you’d need to parse the log files instead. GoAccess maybe?
