"§ 241 Para. 1 BGB describes the performance obligations:
By virtue of the obligation, the creditor is entitled to demand performance from the debtor. The performance can also consist of an omission. "
in this case the Injured Party choose “omission” and you may have noticed , it worked very well , the Tsars have not violated any Obligation ever since.
"§ 241 Para. 1 BGB describes the performance obligations:
By virtue of the obligation, the creditor is entitled to demand performance from the debtor. The performance can also consist of an omission. "
in this case the Injured Party choose “omission” and you may have noticed , it worked very well , the Tsars have not violated any Obligation ever since.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33704/3370453fb1fdea954160896173593d679c91d31d" alt="emoji soviet-playful soviet-playful"
that’s the most German argument I’ve ever seen first off so congrats
German law is not morality. Your obligations are much deeper in truth than that law says
Exactly ! 👇