• iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    11 months ago

    Inside of me there are two wolves - the personal responsibility neoliberal who is annoyed that people don’t read the warnings and kill themselves, and the social responsibility communist that understands that it’s ridiculous to expect everyone to make an informed decision before doing seemingly trivial things. The communist wolf is beating the shit out of the neoliberal one, don’t worry.

        • ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          na

          “obligation” - check out this word , its not big in Angloida Culture , but its important. there are certain “obligations” you have to fullfill … and when you dont … you lose “coverage” only the fullfillment of “obligation” comits the other party to fullfill its “obligation” as well. A Contract commits both Parties … Dont break it.

          • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            I disagree some obligations you are still bound by whatever the other party does. To give a microcosm argument if your wife cheats on you it’s still wrong to beat her up.

            Killing the romanovs was for the russians a sad necessity as otherwise they would have been weaponised and it was still a great wrong Nicholas and his wife less so but the kids that was actually wrong. It would have been far better to go the Puyi route or raise the children anonymously or something

            • ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              "§ 241 Para. 1 BGB describes the performance obligations:

              By virtue of the obligation, the creditor is entitled to demand performance from the debtor. The performance can also consist of an omission. "

              in this case the Injured Party choose “omission” and you may have noticed , it worked very well , the Tsars have not violated any Obligation ever since.
              soviet-playful

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Don’t worry, the census is redefining disability so we can’t see the trends caused by the pandemic. Mission accomplished!

        • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          11 months ago

          It was people doing zero research or testing and just making shit up.

          It didn’t secretly use egg or milk to thicken, dragonfruit contains pectin.

          Chef Pii doesn’t seem like a good person and early batches had packaging issues poorly and errors in the nutrition facts, but there’s no evidence it was dangerous.

        • IceWallowCum [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          When asked whether her product was approved by the Food and Drug Administration, she stated that her product is not a “medical product”, causing further backlash from commenters who noted that the Food and Drug Administration is responsible for regulating food alongside drugs

          This got me lmao

          -------- edit ---------

          Other highlights:

          One TikTok user faked their death after consuming Pink Sauce as a “social experiment to see how quickly other people could spread misinformation”

          .

          As of December 5th 2023, her GoFundMe is at $25,459 out of the $100,000 required, $24,240 of which came from a single donor.

    • Uncle_Bagel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      11 months ago

      The caffeine in coffee has a much lower bioavailability than in energy drinks like this though. Most of the caffeine is locked behind the crll walls in coffee and tea, and oir body has a lot if trouble accessing it. Energy drinks have pure caffeine added into them and it is much more readily available for our bodies to absorb.

      To think of it another way, a typical joint with about a gram of marijuana has about 120-200mg of thc in it. Taking that much thc in an edible would absolutely blast you to the moon, but smoking just gets you regularly high.

        • Uncle_Bagel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          11 months ago

          Pure caffeine was pure wording on my part. “More refined” is what i should have said instead. Coffee and green tea extracts get mashed up and boiled, same as when we use them for regular coffee or tea, but then they will use a series of solvents to further break down the cell walls and further extract the caffeine.

        • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          i don’t think there would be a chemical difference between synthetic & extracted caffeine. as near as i can tell “green coffee extract” is homeopath for the byproduct of water treated (possibly other methods) decaffination.

          however the bioavailability stuff i can’t verify, seems like we’re doing our best to penetrate those cell walls with coffee/tea preparation, lol.

          • CatoPosting [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            11 months ago

            All I have is anecdote, but a 16oz monster doesn’t get me any more wired than the ~18g of coffee beans in my morning cup. Caffeine estimates for my beans sits at about 144mg vs 140mg in a monster.

            • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              i’ve never really noticed any significant differences either. maybe bioavailability isn’t the correct term for looking this up but i can’t find any studies comparing ingestion methods vs. effects

    • mister_flibble@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      The 390 mg one is also the large. The regular clocks in at 260 I believe, which (while objectively not a small amount) is far more within the realms of sanity. Just don’t go all Murica with the sizing and it shouldn’t really be much of a concern.

      • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        The 390 is to skirt the FDA recommendation of 400mg per day while allowing a reasonable margin of error.

        Unfortunately self serve fountains don’t really imply “q per customer” so it was pointless.

  • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    11 months ago

    This lemonade is the final ingredient to my Kahlua + 4loko based cocktail that I’ve been inventing.

    I call it the Heart Palpatini.

    It’ll be drank by line cooks in 45°C kitchens everywhere. Which means it’ll be consumed along with lines of cocaine in the walk in cool room.

  • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 months ago

    The bigger question, in my view, is why should Americans rely on a law firm, and the eventual decisions of a judge and jury in Delaware to decide what will effectively be a national standard for caffeinated lemonade? The answer is that the United States’ regulatory bodies are far too feeble to sufficiently protect the public against hazardous products, and so they essentially outsource this task to consumers and the lawyers who represent them. In peer nations—like, for instance, the United Kingdom—the government imposes strict and consistent regulations on the front end: It requires warning labels on drinks with more than 150 mg of caffeine and bans the sale of these drinks to children under 16. In the U.S., by contrast, the FDA barely regulates caffeine: It does not require manufacturers to include caffeine on the ingredient list of many caffeinated beverages, let alone disclose the amount of caffeine on the label. Nor does the U.S. government bar any consumers from buying ultra-caffeinated products, mandate an explicit warning label, or monitor advertisements. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/12/panera-charged-lemonade-that-kills-you-lawsuit-facts.html

    having caffeine labels on products would blow my mind. i didn’t even think about it until seeing this, but of course slightly-more-normal countries provide labels because it’s a profoundly powerful drug. i have been steadily weaning myself down over the last decade–i used to be a complete freakshow–and it’s not easy given how prevalent it is and how we have to look shit up online to know how much is in something. i would say i’m somewhere between 50-75 mg / day, with the occasional jump up to 150 mg which feels “intense”. i can absolutely have days under 40 mg or even 0 mg and not get a headache or anything… but i will really want to siesta in the afternoon lol. and now i really appreciate the perk of a cup of green tea or even black tea if i’m feeling daring.

    one of these lemonades would fuck me up lmao.

    • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s wild to think some confederate fuckface invented Alcohol/Cocaine Soda in the 1800s because he wanted a nice relaxing beverage to drink outside in the Southern heat while weening himself off of morphine lol

      • LaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Alcohol/Cocaine Soda in the 1800s because he wanted a nice relaxing beverage to drink outside in the Southern heat

        NGL that might make an awful hot and humid August day without A/C more bearable.

    • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      I read a post here that resonated with me. Apparently one of the Chapo hosts (Chapo?) said “stimulants make you evil”

      I don’t do coffee or soda and I seldom have tea tea and often do the herbal stuff. It seems like one of those things where eventually you need it to feel normal

      • LeylaLove [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        Colonization of the Americas pretty much doubled in awfulness once the upper class started loving tobacco. It’s crazy how many atrocities were committed over coffee and cigs.

  • windowlicker [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    11 months ago

    this shit absolutely needs to be regulated, but i won’t act like the yuzu citrus flavor wasn’t delicious and didn’t have me wired all day.