• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I learned in school that a principle of democracy is the equal vote.

    In a direct democracy, this is true. In a representative democracy, this is not.

    In the USA each vote counts for a random amount

    It isn’t random, and the amount is absolutely gamed in favor of a certain party, which is, again, why we need strong institutions.

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The president isn’t voted on as part of the representatives, the office of the president is a separate vote and is supposed to be a direct vote. But the number of electors for each state has not kept up with each state’s population, which has fucked up the power of presidential votes.

        • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The electors only exist because it made it possible to hold a vote across a large nation in a time when horses were the fastest mode of communication. And each elector was supposed to carry the results of the same number of voters.

          But the country has grown, with some states growing in population much faster than others. Yet the number of electors remains unchanged. Not to mention electors are now completely unnecessary as we have fast and reliable communication methods.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You can disagree with the electoral college and still recognize that electors are literally representatives.

            This is basic civics.

            • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              But they aren’t really, they’re just vote messengers, they aren’t on capital hill making laws and advocating for their constituents.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                All representatives are “vote messengers.” That’s why we call them representatives.

                • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I would disagree that senators and congressmen are just vote messengers. They run on active platforms, respond to changes in their constituencies (hopefully), deal with new issues as they arise.

                  Electors literally just ferry the states vote to Washington, that’s it and job done. Representatives continually represent the will of their constituents through multiple years, or at least that’s what they are supposed to do.

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    respond to changes in their constituencies

                    Yes. This is being a representative.

    • pelotron
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Normalize saying “Republicans” instead of “a certain party”