dylan@lemm.ee to Gaming@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoStarfield has "fewest bugs that any game from Bethesda has ever shipped with", Microsoft sayswww.eurogamer.netexternal-linkmessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up193arrow-down10cross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.ml
arrow-up193arrow-down1external-linkStarfield has "fewest bugs that any game from Bethesda has ever shipped with", Microsoft sayswww.eurogamer.netdylan@lemm.ee to Gaming@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square101fedilinkcross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.ml
minus-squareGoronmon@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year ago But you sound more in the now about their internal processes, so you’re probably right and I misinterpreted what they meant by that quote. The general summary of how “bugs” work in software development is simple at a high level. Someone reports the bug (developer, qa, player, user, etc) Someone prioritizes the bug Lower priority issues are put on a backlog to potentially be worked on later Higher priority issues get fixed (most of the time) The product releases when an acceptable level of bugs from steps 3 and 4 are reached, and “acceptable” never means zero or even close to it.
The general summary of how “bugs” work in software development is simple at a high level.
The product releases when an acceptable level of bugs from steps 3 and 4 are reached, and “acceptable” never means zero or even close to it.