• chulo_sinhatche@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    But you don’t have a right for your child to endanger someone else’s child. Obviously there is a blurry line there e.g., if my kid has a PB&J he might endanger the welfare of a child with nut allergies. Are we going to ban nuts? Probably not, because not enough kids can get sick from them to warrant that kind of action.

    Everyone’s kids can get measles. Or covid. Or polio. Or -insert preventable disease here-

    Therefore everyone’s kids should get vaccinated. I get that our government does shady shit sometimes, but people without any scientific background take that and then believe that vaccines are some huge conspiracy.

    It’s not.

    Science proves they work and do not harm you belong a tiny margin of fringe cases where people have severe side effects (like less than 0.1% of ppl).

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Actually, at school parents do get notified if someone in their child’s class has a peanut allergy, in which case the children aren’t allowed to have PB&J at lunch.

      • chulo_sinhatche@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I stand corrected! Just proves my point more though - even if a small population is at risk, we step in as a society decide that people should do/not do a certain thing that has the potential for harm.