When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing āstabilizing treatmentā to pregnant patients by performing an abortionāwithholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death.
The ruling proves what we already know: Roeās demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.
Iāll fully admit that I was unaware of the Texas Castle Doctrine law. That would in fact be an interesting angle to pursue if hospitals had a backbone. But I will stick by my opinion that hospitals will refuse to treat these women as the laws stand now because they will never risk any chance at litigation to save a motherās life.
Do the abortion at home yourself under Castle Doctrine. (Iām not actually advocating this, but it seems to be what Texas wants)
I think the court just made a legal contradiction. The hospital canāt perform an abortion until the woman is already in severe harm ā but by castle doctrine they can also use deadly force to protect her from severe harm.
This puts Republicans in a hilarious position. The contradiction has to be resolved, and no matter how they do it, they lose:
The use of deadly force to prevent some else from severe harm is illegal. You can no longer shoot someone who you think poses harm. Gun nuts are furious.
The hospital can perform an abortion without the woman already suffering.
You just canāt do it, okay?! This implies abortion is not ādeadly forceā, which has all sorts of implications against abortion laws. If it isnāt deadly force, thereās no reason it should prohibited, like any other well founded medical practice.
They could always try to force this outside of the legal framework, but if they ignore the law, thereās no reason to follow the law. They also risk reform, which seems increasingly likely.
Republicans fucked around with overturning Roe, and theyāre going to keep finding out until itās back as a national law.
I agree, the real life metrics would win out. Some other people have pointed out itās not all about that one clause either.