The claim is a major departure for the service, which has long been known as a destination for posting short snippets of text.

  • Hyperlon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the reason above. There’s not a serious alternative that replaced it for those people.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never seriously used twitter (I probably have used it less than 10 hours total), but what really is stopping people from getting on mastodon? It’s the same thing, and is extremely easy to sign up for.

      It’s right there, not that I have much of a desire to use it, but if people like twitter, is it just that not enough people are on it? Just the network effect?

      • Hyperlon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Twitter has more people, meaning more content. It’s the same reason I still have Reddit downloaded.

    • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not about having a serious alternative, what twitter does can mostly be written by like 10 people in 3 months. The problem is scaling it to be big enough while eating that cost until enough people start using it.

      AND the advertising budget.

      There’s no real way to break into that now without a ridiculous amount of investor capital which investors are gunshy in offering for shit like this right now.

      We don’t need an alternative, we need the next generation and I hate to say it but it might just be Discord if they get their shit together.