• Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Laugh at or complain about Ubuntu all you wish… but this type of effort really puts Linux as a compelling competitor to Windows for enterprise desktop users. Rather than paying for the Windows software license and then Microsoft or 3rd party support for the OS on top, the fees would be for dedicated operating system and package support against criticial vulnerabilities. Wouldn’t a business rather have something that “just works as it is” over the long term, rather than something that leaves sysadmins holding their breath every Patch Tuesday with Microsoft randomly shoehorning in “features” here and there that have to be shutoff in GP editor?

    More people using Ubuntu means more will be comfortable switching away from mac/Windows. Plus the free software components benefit from having a dedicated team securely supporting the packages over the long term.

    The longstanding issue that remains is all the industry-specialized software either crappily-coded or riddled with DRMs and whatnot don’t support Linux well yet.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This is valid for end users too. Ubuntu Pro is free for up to 5 machines. People can install 22.04 and stay on it for 10 years or 24.04 for 12 years. That’s the kind of boring stable desktop operation that only Windows XP has managed to muster and people loved it. It’s perfect for the kind of folks who hate having to do major OS upgrades, as well as people who support others for free. Cough … family IT … cough. You bet your ass the family members I support would stay on 22.04 for a looong time!

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Absolutely. Perfect for the people that get spooked at one pixel not being where they were used to it being. (It could be me 😳)

      • lloram239@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Windows has much better forward and backward compatibility than Linux, that’s why 10 year old Windows is still fine. 10 year old Linux on the other side just means nothing modern will work on it. That’s really only usable in extreme edge cases. Flatpak and Snap somewhat address this, but that also puts you back into the forced-upgrade treadmill, as Flatpak runtimes don’t have LTS support (not sure how Snap handles this).